mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Biased are Your Features?: Computing Fairness Influence Functions with Global Sensitivity Analysis

arXiv 2206.00667 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in machine learning has attained significant focus due to the widespread application in high-stake decision-making tasks. Unregulated machine learning classifiers can exhibit bias towards certain demographic groups in data, thus the quantification and mitigation of classifier bias is a central concern in fairness in machine learning. In this paper, we aim to quantify the influence of different features in a dataset on the bias of a classifier. To do this, we introduce the Fairness Influence Function (FIF). This function breaks down bias into its components among individual features and the intersection of multiple features. The key idea is to represent existing group fairness metrics as the difference of the scaled conditional variances in the classifier's prediction and apply a decomposition of variance according to global sensitivity analysis. To estimate FIFs, we instantiate an algorithm FairXplainer that applies variance decomposition of classifier's prediction following local regression. Experiments demonstrate that FairXplainer captures FIFs of individual feature and intersectional features, provides a better approximation of bias based on FIFs, demonstrates higher correlation of FIFs with fairness interventions, and detects changes in bias due to fairness affirmative/punitive actions in the classifier. The code is available at https://github.com/ReAILe/bias-explainer.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

Builds on

21 of 65 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  8. 2019FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifiercited by 63
  9. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 59
  10. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  11. 2015On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationcited by 48
  12. 2020Exacerbating Algorithmic Bias through Fairness Attackscited by 47
9 more
  1. 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
  2. 2022Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influencecited by 38
  3. 2020A survey of bias in Machine Learning through the prism of Statistical Parity for the Adult Data Setcited by 35
  4. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 34
  5. 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25
  6. 2021Explaining Algorithmic Fairness Through Fairness-Aware Causal Path Decompositioncited by 17
  7. 2021Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Modelscited by 16
  8. 2021Fairness seen as Global Sensitivity Analysiscited by 9
  9. 2021Human Imperceptible Attacks and Applications to Improve Fairnesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.