mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML Models

arXiv 2410.08111 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the pervasive deployment of Machine Learning (ML) models in real-world applications, verifying and auditing properties of ML models have become a central concern. In this work, we focus on three properties: robustness, individual fairness, and group fairness. We discuss two approaches for auditing ML model properties: estimation with and without reconstruction of the target model under audit. Though the first approach is studied in the literature, the second approach remains unexplored. For this purpose, we develop a new framework that quantifies different properties in terms of the Fourier coefficients of the ML model under audit but does not parametrically reconstruct it. We propose the Active Fourier Auditor (AFA), which queries sample points according to the Fourier coefficients of the ML model, and further estimates the properties. We derive high probability error bounds on AFA's estimates, along with the worst-case lower bounds on the sample complexity to audit them. Numerically we demonstrate on multiple datasets and models that AFA is more accurate and sample-efficient to estimate the properties of interest than the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  3. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
  6. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  7. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  8. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  9. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  10. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  11. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
  12. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 121
9 more
  1. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  2. 2021Bayesian Algorithm Execution: Estimating Computable Properties of Black-box Functions Using Mutual Informationcited by 33
  3. 2022Active Fairness Auditingcited by 27
  4. 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25
  5. 2021Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Modelscited by 16
  6. 2023From Pseudorandomness to Multi-Group Fairness and Backcited by 13
  7. 2022PAC Verification of Statistical Algorithmscited by 8
  8. 2022Bandits Corrupted by Nature: Lower Bounds on Regret and Robust Optimistic Algorithmcited by 6
  9. 2022Beyond the Best: Estimating Distribution Functionals in Infinite-Armed Banditscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.