mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interactive multi-modal motion planning with Branch Model Predictive Control

arXiv 2109.05128 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2021eess.SY cs.RO cs.SYcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motion planning for autonomous robots and vehicles in presence of uncontrolled agents remains a challenging problem as the reactive behaviors of the uncontrolled agents must be considered. Since the uncontrolled agents usually demonstrate multimodal reactive behavior, the motion planner needs to solve a continuous motion planning problem under these behaviors, which contains a discrete element. We propose a branch Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework that plans over feedback policies to leverage the reactive behavior of the uncontrolled agent. In particular, a scenario tree is constructed from a finite set of policies of the uncontrolled agent, and the branch MPC solves for a feedback policy in the form of a trajectory tree, which shares the same topology as the scenario tree. Moreover, coherent risk measures such as the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) are used as a tuning knob to adjust the tradeoff between performance and robustness. The proposed branch MPC framework is tested on an overtake and lane change task and a merging task for autonomous vehicles in simulation, and on the motion planning of an autonomous quadruped robot alongside an uncontrolled quadruped in experiments. The result demonstrates interesting human-like behaviors, achieving a balance between safety and performance.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022ScePT: Scene-consistent, Policy-based Trajectory Predictions for Planningcited by 63
  2. 2022DiffStack: A Differentiable and Modular Control Stack for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 36
  3. 2024A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approachescited by 19
  4. 2023Active Uncertainty Reduction for Safe and Efficient Interaction Planning: A Shielding-Aware Dual Control Approachcited by 13
  5. 2023Interactive Joint Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 13
  6. 2022Active Uncertainty Reduction for Human-Robot Interaction: An Implicit Dual Control Approachcited by 10
  7. 2024Blending Data-Driven Priors in Dynamic Gamescited by 5
  8. 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictionscited by 4
  9. 2023Proactive Emergency Collision Avoidance for Automated Driving in Highway Scenarioscited by 3
  10. 2024A First Physical-World Trajectory Prediction Attack via LiDAR-induced Deceptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
  11. 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysiscited by 3
  12. 2025Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: A Reviewcited by 3
9 more
  1. 2023IR-STP: Enhancing Autonomous Driving with Interaction Reasoning in Spatio-Temporal Planningcited by 2
  2. 2025EP-Diffuser: An Efficient Diffusion Model for Traffic Scene Generation and Prediction via Polynomial Representationscited by 1
  3. 2024Scalable Multi-modal Model Predictive Control via Duality-based Interaction Predictionscited by 0
  4. 2025Model Predictive Control for Crowd Navigation via Learning-Based Trajectory Predictioncited by 0
  5. 2025An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Merging Decision-Making Considering Social Acceptance for Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
  6. 2025Safe and Nonconservative Contingency Planning for Autonomous Vehicles via Online Learning-Based Reachable Set Barrierscited by 0
  7. 2026Interactive Trajectory Planning with Learning-based Distributionally Robust Model Predictive Control and Markov Systemscited by 0
  8. 2026Still Camouflage, Moving Illusion: View-Induced Trajectory Manipulation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
  9. 2026Kernel-Based Metrics Learning for Uncertain Opponent Vehicle Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous Racingcited by 0