mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A First Physical-World Trajectory Prediction Attack via LiDAR-induced Deceptions in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2406.11707 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trajectory prediction forecasts nearby agents' moves based on their historical trajectories. Accurate trajectory prediction is crucial for autonomous vehicles. Existing attacks compromise the prediction model of a victim AV by directly manipulating the historical trajectory of an attacker AV, which has limited real-world applicability. This paper, for the first time, explores an indirect attack approach that induces prediction errors via attacks against the perception module of a victim AV. Although it has been shown that physically realizable attacks against LiDAR-based perception are possible by placing a few objects at strategic locations, it is still an open challenge to find an object location from the vast search space in order to launch effective attacks against prediction under varying victim AV velocities. Through analysis, we observe that a prediction model is prone to an attack focusing on a single point in the scene. Consequently, we propose a novel two-stage attack framework to realize the single-point attack. The first stage of prediction-side attack efficiently identifies, guided by the distribution of detection results under object-based attacks against perception, the state perturbations for the prediction model that are effective and velocity-insensitive. In the second stage of location matching, we match the feasible object locations with the found state perturbations. Our evaluation using a public autonomous driving dataset shows that our attack causes a collision rate of up to 63% and various hazardous responses of the victim AV. The effectiveness of our attack is also demonstrated on a real testbed car. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first security analysis spanning from LiDAR-based perception to prediction in autonomous driving, leading to a realistic attack on prediction. To counteract the proposed attack, potential defenses are discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

37 of 67 references.

References · 37

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  5. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
  6. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  7. 2020Learning Lane Graph Representations for Motion Forecastingcited by 380
  8. 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
  9. 2021AgentFormer: Agent-Aware Transformers for Socio-Temporal Multi-Agent Forecastingcited by 327
  10. 2017DESIRE: Distant Future Prediction in Dynamic Scenes with Interacting Agentscited by 310
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
  12. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
25 more
  1. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 240
  2. 2021Multimodal Motion Prediction with Stacked Transformerscited by 207
  3. 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
  4. 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
  5. 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradientscited by 122
  6. 2021LaneRCNN: Distributed Representations for Graph-Centric Motion Forecastingcited by 112
  7. 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
  8. 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
  9. 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
  10. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 89
  11. 2022ScePT: Scene-consistent, Policy-based Trajectory Predictions for Planningcited by 63
  12. 2022AdvDO: Realistic Adversarial Attacks for Trajectory Predictioncited by 48
  13. 2019Hybrid Batch Attacks: Finding Black-box Adversarial Examples with Limited Queriescited by 33
  14. 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
  15. 2020Probabilistic Multi-modal Trajectory Prediction with Lane Attention for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 28
  16. 2020Robust Tracking against Adversarial Attackscited by 28
  17. 2021Interactive multi-modal motion planning with Branch Model Predictive Controlcited by 21
  18. 2022Robust Trajectory Prediction against Adversarial Attackscited by 16
  19. 2021Object Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectorscited by 15
  20. 2023SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  21. 2022Too Afraid to Drive: Systematic Discovery of Semantic DoS Vulnerability in Autonomous Driving Planning under Physical-World Attackscited by 11
  22. 2022Targeted Adversarial Attacks against Neural Network Trajectory Predictorscited by 11
  23. 2020ML-driven Malware that Targets AV Safetycited by 9
  24. 2022Using 3D Shadows to Detect Object Hiding Attacks on Autonomous Vehicle Perceptioncited by 5
  25. 2023ADoPT: LiDAR Spoofing Attack Detection Based on Point-Level Temporal Consistencycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.