mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable AI for Engineering Design: A Unified Approach of Systems Engineering and Component- Based Deep Learning Demonstrated by Energy- Efficient Building Design

arXiv 2108.13836 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.SE cs.SYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven models created by machine learning, gain in importance in all fields of design and engineering. They, have high potential to assist decision-makers in creating novel, artefacts with better performance and sustainability. However,, limited generalization and the black-box nature of these models, lead to limited explainability and reusability. To overcome this, situation, we propose a component-based approach to create, partial component models by machine learning (ML). This, component-based approach aligns deep learning with systems, engineering (SE). The key contribution of the component-based, method is that activations at interfaces between the components, are interpretable engineering quantities. In this way, the, hierarchical component system forms a deep neural network, (DNN) that a priori integrates information for engineering, explainability. The, approach adapts the model structure to engineering methods of, systems engineering and to domain knowledge. We examine the, performance of the approach by the field of energy-efficient, building design: First, we observed better generalization of the, component-based method by analyzing prediction accuracy, outside the training data. Especially for representative designs, different in structure, we observe a much higher accuracy, (R2 = 0.94) compared to conventional monolithic methods, (R2 = 0.71). Second, we illustrate explainability by exemplary, demonstrating how sensitivity information from SE and rules, from low-depth decision trees serve engineering. Third, we, evaluate explainability by qualitative and quantitative methods, demonstrating the matching of preliminary knowledge and data-driven, derived strategies and show correctness of activations at, component interfaces compared to white-box simulation results, (envelope components: R2 = 0.92..0.99; zones: R2 = 0.78..0.93).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2021.

Builds on

11 of 96 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  3. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  4. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  5. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  6. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  7. 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 203
  8. 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 165
  9. 2020Interpretable Machine Learning -- A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challengescited by 120
  10. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  11. 2021Explainable Machine Learning with Prior Knowledge: An Overviewcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.

3 papers.