mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

cushLEPOR: customising hLEPOR metric using Optuna for higher agreement with human judgments or pre-trained language model LaBSE

arXiv 2108.09484 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human evaluation has always been expensive while researchers struggle to trust the automatic metrics. To address this, we propose to customise traditional metrics by taking advantages of the pre-trained language models (PLMs) and the limited available human labelled scores. We first re-introduce the hLEPOR metric factors, followed by the Python version we developed (ported) which achieved the automatic tuning of the weighting parameters in hLEPOR metric. Then we present the customised hLEPOR (cushLEPOR) which uses Optuna hyper-parameter optimisation framework to fine-tune hLEPOR weighting parameters towards better agreement to pre-trained language models (using LaBSE) regarding the exact MT language pairs that cushLEPOR is deployed to. We also optimise cushLEPOR towards professional human evaluation data based on MQM and pSQM framework on English-German and Chinese-English language pairs. The experimental investigations show cushLEPOR boosts hLEPOR performances towards better agreements to PLMs like LaBSE with much lower cost, and better agreements to human evaluations including MQM and pSQM scores, and yields much better performances than BLEU (data available at urlhttps://github.com/poethan/cushLEPOR). Official results show that our submissions win three language pairs including English-German and Chinese-English on textitNews domain via cushLEPOR(LM) and English-Russian on textitTED domain via hLEPOR.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2021.

Builds on

15 of 32 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  4. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  5. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
  6. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  7. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  8. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  9. 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 167
  10. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
  11. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 70
  12. 2021Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methodscited by 23
3 more
  1. 2021Chinese Character Decomposition for Neural MT with Multi-Word Expressionscited by 11
  2. 2017LEPOR: An Augmented Machine Translation Evaluation Metriccited by 6
  3. 2021Meta-evaluation of Conversational Search Evaluation Metricscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

8 papers.