An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since the 1950s, machine translation (MT) has become one of the important tasks of AI and development, and has experienced several different periods and stages of development, including rule-based methods, statistical methods, and recently proposed neural network-based learning methods. Accompanying these staged leaps is the evaluation research and development of MT, especially the important role of evaluation methods in statistical translation and neural translation research. The evaluation task of MT is not only to evaluate the quality of machine translation, but also to give timely feedback to machine translation researchers on the problems existing in machine translation itself, how to improve and how to optimise. In some practical application fields, such as in the absence of reference translations, the quality estimation of machine translation plays an important role as an indicator to reveal the credibility of automatically translated target languages. This report mainly includes the following contents: a brief history of machine translation evaluation (MTE), the classification of research methods on MTE, and the the cutting-edge progress, including human evaluation, automatic evaluation, and evaluation of evaluation methods (meta-evaluation). Manual evaluation and automatic evaluation include reference-translation based and reference-translation independent participation; automatic evaluation methods include traditional n-gram string matching, models applying syntax and semantics, and deep learning models; evaluation of evaluation methods includes estimating the credibility of human evaluations, the reliability of the automatic evaluation, the reliability of the test set, etc. Advances in cutting-edge evaluation methods include task-based evaluation, using pre-trained language models based on big data, and lightweight optimisation models using distillation techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 141 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2022.
Builds on
22 of 141 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
10 more
- 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
- 2019Translationese in Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 38
- 2020A Set of Recommendations for Assessing Human-Machine Parity in Language Translationcited by 34
- 2021Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methodscited by 23
- 2021Measuring Uncertainty in Translation Quality Evaluation (TQE)cited by 16
- 2019Pairwise Neural Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 11
- 2021Chinese Character Decomposition for Neural MT with Multi-Word Expressionscited by 11
- 2021cushLEPOR: customising hLEPOR metric using Optuna for higher agreement with human judgments or pre-trained language model LaBSEcited by 8
- 2017LEPOR: An Augmented Machine Translation Evaluation Metriccited by 6
- 2016Neural Machine Translation Advised by Statistical Machine Translationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Examining Large Pre-Trained Language Models for Machine Translation: What You Don't Know About Itcited by 3
- 2023Topic Modelling of Swedish Newspaper Articles about Coronavirus: a Case Study using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Methodcited by 2
- 2023Student's t-Distribution: On Measuring the Inter-Rater Reliability When the Observations are Scarcecited by 2
- 2024Asynchronous and Segmented Bidirectional Encoding for NMTcited by 2
- 2024Asynchronous and Segmented Bidirectional Encoding for NMT19 Feb 2024
- 2023Student's t-Distribution: On Measuring the Inter-Rater Reliability When the Observations are Scarce8 Mar 2023
- 2023Topic Modelling of Swedish Newspaper Articles about Coronavirus: a Case Study using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method8 Jan 2023
- 2022Examining Large Pre-Trained Language Models for Machine Translation: What You Don't Know About It15 Sep 2022