3D Shapes Local Geometry Codes Learning with SDF
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A signed distance function (SDF) as the 3D shape description is one of the most effective approaches to represent 3D geometry for rendering and reconstruction. Our work is inspired by the state-of-the-art method DeepSDF that learns and analyzes the 3D shape as the iso-surface of its shell and this method has shown promising results especially in the 3D shape reconstruction and compression domain. In this paper, we consider the degeneration problem of reconstruction coming from the capacity decrease of the DeepSDF model, which approximates the SDF with a neural network and a single latent code. We propose Local Geometry Code Learning (LGCL), a model that improves the original DeepSDF results by learning from a local shape geometry of the full 3D shape. We add an extra graph neural network to split the single transmittable latent code into a set of local latent codes distributed on the 3D shape. Mentioned latent codes are used to approximate the SDF in their local regions, which will alleviate the complexity of the approximation compared to the original DeepSDF. Furthermore, we introduce a new geometric loss function to facilitate the training of these local latent codes. Note that other local shape adjusting methods use the 3D voxel representation, which in turn is a problem highly difficult to solve or even is insolvable. In contrast, our architecture is based on graph processing implicitly and performs the learning regression process directly in the latent code space, thus make the proposed architecture more flexible and also simple for realization. Our experiments on 3D shape reconstruction demonstrate that our LGCL method can keep more details with a significantly smaller size of the SDF decoder and outperforms considerably the original DeepSDF method under the most important quantitative metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2021.
Builds on
22 of 26 references.
References · 22
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
- 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
- 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 707
- 2021Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapescited by 426
- 2019SAL: Sign Agnostic Learning of Shapes from Raw Datacited by 389
- 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 372
10 more
- 2020Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstructioncited by 321
- 2018Generating 3D faces using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoderscited by 267
- 2019Learning Shape Templates with Structured Implicit Functionscited by 242
- 2020SALD: Sign Agnostic Learning with Derivativescited by 115
- 2020MeshSDF: Differentiable Iso-Surface Extractioncited by 112
- 2019Neural 3D Morphable Models: Spiral Convolutional Networks for 3D Shape Representation Learning and Generationcited by 89
- 2020DualSDF: Semantic Shape Manipulation using a Two-Level Representationcited by 82
- 2020PatchNets: Patch-Based Generalizable Deep Implicit 3D Shape Representationscited by 81
- 2020Fully Convolutional Mesh Autoencoder using Efficient Spatially Varying Kernelscited by 53
- 2020Deep Implicit Volume Compressioncited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Neural Points: Point Cloud Representation with Neural Fields for Arbitrary Upsamplingcited by 48
- 2022Surface Reconstruction from Point Clouds: A Survey and a Benchmarkcited by 41
- 2022Latent Partition Implicit with Surface Codes for 3D Representationcited by 21
- 2022PRIF: Primary Ray-based Implicit Functioncited by 17
- 2023PolyGNN: Polyhedron-based Graph Neural Network for 3D Building Reconstruction from Point Cloudscited by 10
- 2025F-INR: Functional Tensor Decomposition for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 6
- 2023Adaptive Local Basis Functions for Shape Completioncited by 4
- 2022Isomorphic mesh generation from point clouds with multilayer perceptronscited by 1
- 2021Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of a Fast Algorithm for Extracting Polygons from Signed Distance Boundscited by 0
- 2022Taylor3DNet: Fast 3D Shape Inference With Landmark Points Based Taylor Seriescited by 0
- 2025F-INR: Functional Tensor Decomposition for Implicit Neural Representations27 Mar 2025
- 2023PolyGNN: Polyhedron-based Graph Neural Network for 3D Building Reconstruction from Point Clouds17 Jul 2023
- 2023Adaptive Local Basis Functions for Shape Completion17 Jul 2023
- 2022Isomorphic mesh generation from point clouds with multilayer perceptrons21 Oct 2022
- 2022PRIF: Primary Ray-based Implicit Function12 Aug 2022
- 2022Latent Partition Implicit with Surface Codes for 3D Representation18 Jul 2022
- 2022Surface Reconstruction from Point Clouds: A Survey and a Benchmark5 May 2022
- 2022Taylor3DNet: Fast 3D Shape Inference With Landmark Points Based Taylor Series18 Jan 2022
- 2021Neural Points: Point Cloud Representation with Neural Fields for Arbitrary Upsampling8 Dec 2021
- 2021Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of a Fast Algorithm for Extracting Polygons from Signed Distance Bounds10 Nov 2021