mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Algorithmic Fairness Through Fairness-Aware Causal Path Decomposition

arXiv 2108.05335 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic fairness has aroused considerable interests in data mining and machine learning communities recently. So far the existing research has been mostly focusing on the development of quantitative metrics to measure algorithm disparities across different protected groups, and approaches for adjusting the algorithm output to reduce such disparities. In this paper, we propose to study the problem of identification of the source of model disparities. Unlike existing interpretation methods which typically learn feature importance, we consider the causal relationships among feature variables and propose a novel framework to decompose the disparity into the sum of contributions from fairness-aware causal paths, which are paths linking the sensitive attribute and the final predictions, on the graph. We also consider the scenario when the directions on certain edges within those paths cannot be determined. Our framework is also model agnostic and applicable to a variety of quantitative disparity measures. Empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world data sets are provided to show that our method can provide precise and comprehensive explanations to the model disparities.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2021.

Builds on

19 of 37 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  8. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  9. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  10. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
  11. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
  12. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
7 more
  1. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  2. 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
  3. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  4. 2019PC-Fairness: A Unified Framework for Measuring Causality-based Fairnesscited by 67
  5. 2020Shapley Flow: A Graph-based Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 51
  6. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 33
  7. 2019Fairness criteria through the lens of directed acyclic graphical modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort: