mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Input-agnostic Certified Group Fairness via Gaussian Parameter Smoothing

arXiv 2206.11423 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Only recently, researchers attempt to provide classification algorithms with provable group fairness guarantees. Most of these algorithms suffer from harassment caused by the requirement that the training and deployment data follow the same distribution. This paper proposes an input-agnostic certified group fairness algorithm, FairSmooth, for improving the fairness of classification models while maintaining the remarkable prediction accuracy. A Gaussian parameter smoothing method is developed to transform base classifiers into their smooth versions. An optimal individual smooth classifier is learnt for each group with only the data regarding the group and an overall smooth classifier for all groups is generated by averaging the parameters of all the individual smooth ones. By leveraging the theory of nonlinear functional analysis, the smooth classifiers are reformulated as output functions of a Nemytskii operator. Theoretical analysis is conducted to derive that the Nemytskii operator is smooth and induces a Frechet differentiable smooth manifold. We theoretically demonstrate that the smooth manifold has a global Lipschitz constant that is independent of the domain of the input data, which derives the input-agnostic certified group fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2022.

Builds on

59 of 102 references.

References · 59

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  8. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  9. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  10. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  11. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  12. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
38 more
  1. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  2. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  3. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 192
  4. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
  5. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  6. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  7. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 144
  8. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  9. 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
  10. 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
  11. 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
  12. 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 100
  13. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  14. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  15. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
  16. 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
  17. 2019Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Makingcited by 75
  18. 2016A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracycited by 73
  19. 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
  20. 2019Tight Certificates of Adversarial Robustness for Randomly Smoothed Classifierscited by 65
  21. 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
  22. 2019Robustness Certificates for Sparse Adversarial Attacks by Randomized Ablationcited by 60
  23. 2020How Do Fair Decisions Fare in Long-term Qualification?cited by 60
  24. 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
  25. 2018Learning Optimal Fair Policiescited by 49
  26. 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
  27. 2018Fairness Behind a Veil of Ignorance: A Welfare Analysis for Automated Decision Makingcited by 46
  28. 2021Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimationcited by 45
  29. 2020Higher-Order Certification for Randomized Smoothingcited by 37
  30. 2018Discrete Adversarial Attacks and Submodular Optimization with Applications to Text Classificationcited by 35
  31. 2020Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify ℓ_∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Imagescited by 35
  32. 2020Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training Datacited by 35
  33. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  34. 2019Stable and Fair Classificationcited by 25
  35. 2020Does enforcing fairness mitigate biases caused by subpopulation shift?cited by 25
  36. 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
  37. 2021Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
  38. 2017Provably Fair Representationscited by 22

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.