Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing prevalence of machine learning and artificial intelligence-based medical decision support systems, it is equally important to ensure that these systems provide patient outcomes in a fair and equitable fashion. This paper presents an innovative framework for detecting areas of algorithmic bias in medical-AI decision support systems. Our approach efficiently identifies potential biases in medical-AI models, specifically in the context of sepsis prediction, by employing the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm with conformity scores. We verify our methodology by conducting a series of synthetic data experiments, showcasing its ability to estimate areas of bias in controlled settings precisely. The effectiveness of the concept is further validated by experiments using electronic medical records from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. These tests demonstrate the practical implementation of our strategy in a clinical environment, where it can function as a vital instrument for guaranteeing fairness and equity in AI-based medical decisions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2023.
Builds on
14 of 52 references.
References · 14
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2020Understanding Failures of Deep Networks via Robust Feature Extractioncited by 56
- 2018Towards Accountable AI: Hybrid Human-Machine Analyses for Characterizing System Failurecited by 49
- 2018Fairness Under Compositioncited by 43
- 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.