Measuring Distortion in the Empty Regions of Dimensionality Reduction Scatterplots with the Gap Index
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quality metrics play a crucial role in the proper use of dimensionality reduction projections for visual analysis of high-dimensional data. They quantify the degree of distortion of a projection compared to the high-dimensional data and provide a reliable indication of how confident users can be in the structures they see in the resulting layouts. However, most popular metrics focus on capturing direct relationships between points (e.g., distances or neighborhoods) while neglecting distortions in empty areas of the layout, even though these often compose visually relevant features of a 2D layout. In this paper, we introduce the Gap Index (GI), a quality metric for 2D projections that captures visual distortion by measuring spatial distortion in empty areas of a projection. It does so by decomposing the space into empty triangles, which are then compared to their high-dimensional counterparts to compute the deformation. This per-triangle deformation can be aggregated into a single scalar value or overlaid on a projection to visualize regional distortion patterns. Results show that, contrary to popular quality metrics, the GI is sensitive to small structural deformations that have high visual impact. It is also fast to compute and interpretable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 56 references.
References · 7
- 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 102
- 2021Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projectionscited by 20
- 2023ZADU: A Python Library for Evaluating the Reliability of Dimensionality Reduction Embeddingscited by 15
- 2023Interpreting the Curse of Dimensionality from Distance Concentration and Manifold Effectcited by 14
- 2020Modeling the Influence of Visual Density on Cluster Perception in Scatterplots Using Topologycited by 7
- 2024"Normalized Stress" is Not Normalized: How to Interpret Stress Correctlycited by 5
- 2025Mind the Gaps: Measuring Visual Artifacts in Dimensionality Reductioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.