mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning for Fraud Detection in E-Commerce: A Research Agenda

arXiv 2107.01979 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.CR stat.APcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fraud detection and prevention play an important part in ensuring the sustained operation of any e-commerce business. Machine learning (ML) often plays an important role in these anti-fraud operations, but the organizational context in which these ML models operate cannot be ignored. In this paper, we take an organization-centric view on the topic of fraud detection by formulating an operational model of the anti-fraud departments in e-commerce organizations. We derive 6 research topics and 12 practical challenges for fraud detection from this operational model. We summarize the state of the literature for each research topic, discuss potential solutions to the practical challenges, and identify 22 open research challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2021.

Builds on

30 of 102 references.

References · 30

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  6. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  7. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
  8. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
  9. 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 389
  10. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  11. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  12. 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
18 more
  1. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  2. 2016Multiple Instance Learning: A Survey of Problem Characteristics and Applicationscited by 163
  3. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 151
  4. 2013Online Learning under Delayed Feedbackcited by 137
  5. 2014Toward Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 73
  6. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
  7. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
  8. 2020Exacerbating Algorithmic Bias through Fairness Attackscited by 47
  9. 2020Technology Readiness Levels for AI & MLcited by 30
  10. 2020Adapting to Delays and Data in Adversarial Multi-Armed Banditscited by 29
  11. 2019Epistemic Uncertainty Samplingcited by 24
  12. 2020FairOD: Fairness-aware Outlier Detectioncited by 24
  13. 2019A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processingcited by 23
  14. 2018Streaming Active Learning Strategies for Real-Life Credit Card Fraud Detection: Assessment and Visualizationcited by 14
  15. 2020Uncovering Insurance Fraud Conspiracy with Network Learningcited by 9
  16. 2020Nested Multiple Instance Learning in Modelling of HTTP network trafficcited by 5
  17. 2016Search Improves Label for Active Learningcited by 4
  18. 2018Credit Card Fraud Detection in e-Commerce: An Outlier Detection Approachcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

5 papers.