mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Streaming Active Learning Strategies for Real-Life Credit Card Fraud Detection: Assessment and Visualization

arXiv 1804.07481 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Credit card fraud detection is a very challenging problem because of the specific nature of transaction data and the labeling process. The transaction data is peculiar because they are obtained in a streaming fashion, they are strongly imbalanced and prone to non-stationarity. The labeling is the outcome of an active learning process, as every day human investigators contact only a small number of cardholders (associated to the riskiest transactions) and obtain the class (fraud or genuine) of the related transactions. An adequate selection of the set of cardholders is therefore crucial for an efficient fraud detection process. In this paper, we present a number of active learning strategies and we investigate their fraud detection accuracies. We compare different criteria (supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised) to query unlabeled transactions. Finally, we highlight the existence of an exploitation/exploration trade-off for active learning in the context of fraud detection, which has so far been overlooked in the literature.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: