Targeted Data Acquisition for Evolving Negotiation Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Successful negotiators must learn how to balance optimizing for self-interest and cooperation. Yet current artificial negotiation agents often heavily depend on the quality of the static datasets they were trained on, limiting their capacity to fashion an adaptive response balancing self-interest and cooperation. For this reason, we find that these agents can achieve either high utility or cooperation, but not both. To address this, we introduce a targeted data acquisition framework where we guide the exploration of a reinforcement learning agent using annotations from an expert oracle. The guided exploration incentivizes the learning agent to go beyond its static dataset and develop new negotiation strategies. We show that this enables our agents to obtain higher-reward and more Pareto-optimal solutions when negotiating with both simulated and human partners compared to standard supervised learning and reinforcement learning methods. This trend additionally holds when comparing agents using our targeted data acquisition framework to variants of agents trained with a mix of supervised learning and reinforcement learning, or to agents using tailored reward functions that explicitly optimize for utility and Pareto-optimality.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.
Builds on
23 of 42 references.
References · 23
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2017Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewardscited by 302
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 286
- 2017Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialoguescited by 202
- 2016Multi-Agent Cooperation and the Emergence of (Natural) Languagecited by 181
- 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2018Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialoguescited by 156
- 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
- 2018Emergent Communication through Negotiationcited by 62
- 2017Neural AMR: Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Parsing and Generationcited by 56
11 more
- 2019Rethinking Action Spaces for Reinforcement Learning in End-to-end Dialog Agents with Latent Variable Modelscited by 53
- 2019Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialoguecited by 44
- 2020Towards Ecologically Valid Research on Language User Interfacescited by 42
- 2021A Survey on Interactive Reinforcement Learning: Design Principles and Open Challengescited by 41
- 2018Guiding Policies with Language via Meta-Learningcited by 34
- 2019Continual adaptation for efficient machine communicationcited by 28
- 2021On the Critical Role of Conventions in Adaptive Human-AI Collaborationcited by 26
- 2017Hierarchical Text Generation and Planning for Strategic Dialoguecited by 23
- 2020Learning Adaptive Language Interfaces through Decompositioncited by 22
- 2020Deploying Lifelong Open-Domain Dialogue Learningcited by 17
- 2017Mastering the Dungeon: Grounded Language Learning by Mechanical Turker Descentcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.