mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FairCanary: Rapid Continuous Explainable Fairness

arXiv 2106.07057 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.CYcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systems that offer continuous model monitoring have emerged in response to (1) well-documented failures of deployed Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and (2) new regulatory requirements impacting these models. Existing monitoring systems continuously track the performance of deployed ML models and compute feature importance (a.k.a. explanations) for each prediction to help developers identify the root causes of emergent model performance problems. We present Quantile Demographic Drift (QDD), a novel model bias quantification metric that uses quantile binning to measure differences in the overall prediction distributions over subgroups. QDD is ideal for continuous monitoring scenarios, does not suffer from the statistical limitations of conventional threshold-based bias metrics, and does not require outcome labels (which may not be available at runtime). We incorporate QDD into a continuous model monitoring system, called FairCanary, that reuses existing explanations computed for each individual prediction to quickly compute explanations for the QDD bias metrics. This optimization makes FairCanary an order of magnitude faster than previous work that has tried to generate feature-level bias explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2021.

Builds on

46 of 100 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  7. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  8. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  9. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  10. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  11. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  12. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
34 more
  1. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  2. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  3. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  4. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 197
  5. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  6. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  7. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  8. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  9. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  10. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  11. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
  12. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  13. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  14. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  15. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  16. 2021Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyondcited by 102
  17. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  18. 2020The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategiescited by 91
  19. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  20. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  21. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 55
  22. 2018Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 51
  23. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  24. 2021Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffscited by 48
  25. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  26. 2019The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 35
  27. 2019Stable and Fair Classificationcited by 25
  28. 2017Fair Forests: Regularized Tree Induction to Minimize Model Biascited by 19
  29. 2019Fairness-Aware Neural R'eyni Minimization for Continuous Featurescited by 15
  30. 2020Achieving Fairness via Post-Processing in Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 13
  31. 2020Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning modelscited by 13
  32. 2019Automatic Model Monitoring for Data Streamscited by 9
  33. 2021Unified Shapley Framework to Explain Prediction Driftcited by 4
  34. 2019ML Health: Fitness Tracking for Production Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

12 papers.