mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unified Shapley Framework to Explain Prediction Drift

arXiv 2102.07862 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predictions are the currency of a machine learning model, and to understand the model's behavior over segments of a dataset, or over time, is an important problem in machine learning research and practice. There currently is no systematic framework to understand this drift in prediction distributions over time or between two semantically meaningful slices of data, in terms of the input features and points. We propose GroupShapley and GroupIG (Integrated Gradients), as axiomatically justified methods to tackle this problem. In doing so, we re-frame all current feature/data importance measures based on the Shapley value as essentially problems of distributional comparisons, and unify them under a common umbrella. We axiomatize certain desirable properties of distributional difference, and study the implications of choosing them empirically.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2021.

Builds on

12 of 53 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  4. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  5. 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 79
  6. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  7. 2018Sliced-Wasserstein Autoencoder: An Embarrassingly Simple Generative Modelcited by 33
  8. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 33
  9. 2015Concept Drift Detection for Streaming Datacited by 18
  10. 2020Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning modelscited by 13
  11. 2019Automatic Model Monitoring for Data Streamscited by 9
  12. 2019ML Health: Fitness Tracking for Production Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.