mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generating Hypothetical Events for Abductive Inference

arXiv 2106.03973 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Abductive reasoning starts from some observations and aims at finding the most plausible explanation for these observations. To perform abduction, humans often make use of temporal and causal inferences, and knowledge about how some hypothetical situation can result in different outcomes. This work offers the first study of how such knowledge impacts the Abductive NLI task -- which consists in choosing the more likely explanation for given observations. We train a specialized language model LMI that is tasked to generate what could happen next from a hypothetical scenario that evolves from a given event. We then propose a multi-task model MTL to solve the Abductive NLI task, which predicts a plausible explanation by a) considering different possible events emerging from candidate hypotheses -- events generated by LMI -- and b) selecting the one that is most similar to the observed outcome. We show that our MTL model improves over prior vanilla pre-trained LMs fine-tuned on Abductive NLI. Our manual evaluation and analysis suggest that learning about possible next events from different hypothetical scenarios supports abductive inference.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

27 of 50 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  4. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
  5. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  6. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  7. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
  8. 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 417
  9. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  10. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 301
  11. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 285
  12. 2019KagNet: Knowledge-Aware Graph Networks for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 216
15 more
  1. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 200
  2. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  3. 2020Generating Fact Checking Explanationscited by 132
  4. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 88
  5. 2019Counterfactual Story Reasoning and Generationcited by 88
  6. 2018Event2Mind: Commonsense Inference on Events, Intents, and Reactionscited by 82
  7. 2019WIQA: A dataset for "What if..." reasoning over procedural textcited by 71
  8. 2020Language Generation with Multi-Hop Reasoning on Commonsense Knowledge Graphcited by 57
  9. 2019When Choosing Plausible Alternatives, Clever Hans can be Clevercited by 40
  10. 2020Explaining Question Answering Models through Text Generationcited by 33
  11. 2020A Survey on Explainability in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 33
  12. 2019Ranking and Selecting Multi-Hop Knowledge Paths to Better Predict Human Needscited by 22
  13. 2021COINS: Dynamically Generating COntextualized Inference Rules for Narrative Story Completioncited by 12
  14. 2020Social Commonsense Reasoning with Multi-Head Knowledge Attentioncited by 10
  15. 2020L2R2: Leveraging Ranking for Abductive Reasoningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.