mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Post-Contextual-Bandit Inference

arXiv 2106.00418 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contextual bandit algorithms are increasingly replacing non-adaptive A/B tests in e-commerce, healthcare, and policymaking because they can both improve outcomes for study participants and increase the chance of identifying good or even best policies. To support credible inference on novel interventions at the end of the study, nonetheless, we still want to construct valid confidence intervals on average treatment effects, subgroup effects, or value of new policies. The adaptive nature of the data collected by contextual bandit algorithms, however, makes this difficult: standard estimators are no longer asymptotically normally distributed and classic confidence intervals fail to provide correct coverage. While this has been addressed in non-contextual settings by using stabilized estimators, the contextual setting poses unique challenges that we tackle for the first time in this paper. We propose the Contextual Adaptive Doubly Robust (CADR) estimator, the first estimator for policy value that is asymptotically normal under contextual adaptive data collection. The main technical challenge in constructing CADR is designing adaptive and consistent conditional standard deviation estimators for stabilization. Extensive numerical experiments using 57 OpenML datasets demonstrate that confidence intervals based on CADR uniquely provide correct coverage.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

15 of 48 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  2. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  3. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  4. 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
  5. 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
  6. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  7. 2019Efficiently Breaking the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation with Double Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  8. 2017Balanced Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 51
  9. 2021Statistical Inference with M-Estimators on Adaptively Collected Datacited by 40
  10. 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
  11. 2016Dynamic Pricing with Demand Covariatescited by 30
  12. 2019Intrinsically Efficient, Stable, and Bounded Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
3 more
  1. 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  2. 2017Estimation Considerations in Contextual Banditscited by 22
  3. 2016Dynamic Assortment Personalization in High Dimensionscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 7; 2026: 8.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual banditscited by 37
  2. 2024UCB algorithms for multi-armed bandits: Precise regret and adaptive inferencecited by 16
  3. 2022Counterfactual inference in sequential experimentscited by 13
  4. 2024Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choicescited by 12
  5. 2024Inference with the Upper Confidence Bound Algorithmcited by 9
  6. 2022Synthetically Controlled Banditscited by 8
  7. 2022Near-Optimal Non-Parametric Sequential Tests and Confidence Sequences with Possibly Dependent Observationscited by 8
  8. 2023Semi-parametric inference based on adaptively collected datacited by 6
  9. 2023Did we personalize? Assessing personalization by an online reinforcement learning algorithm using resamplingcited by 6
  10. 2023Adaptive Linear Estimating Equationscited by 6
  11. 2024Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluationcited by 6
  12. 2025Stable Thompson Sampling: Valid Inference via Variance Inflationcited by 6
20 more
  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning in the Real World: A Survey of Statistical Challenges and Future Directionscited by 5
  2. 2021Doubly Robust Interval Estimation for Optimal Policy Evaluation in Online Learningcited by 4
  3. 2022Optimal Best Arm Identification in Two-Armed Bandits with a Fixed Budget under a Small Gapcited by 4
  4. 2023Online learning in bandits with predicted contextcited by 4
  5. 2022Best Arm Identification with Contextual Information under a Small Gapcited by 3
  6. 2025Simulation-Based Inference for Adaptive Experimentscited by 3
  7. 2025Adaptive Off-Policy Inference for M-Estimators Under Model Misspecificationcited by 3
  8. 2026Valid Best-Model Identification for LLM Evaluation via Low-Rank Factorizationcited by 3
  9. 2025Statistical Inference in Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Surveycited by 2
  10. 2026A Statistical Test for the Benefits of Personalizing Interventionscited by 2
  11. 2022Entropy Regularization for Population Estimationcited by 1
  12. 2024Demistifying Inference after Adaptive Experimentscited by 1
  13. 2025Kernel Treatment Effects with Adaptively Collected Datacited by 1
  14. 2026Efficient Inference after Directionally Stable Adaptive Experimentscited by 1
  15. 2026Anytime-valid Optimal Policy Identificationcited by 1
  16. 2025SNPL: Simultaneous Policy Learning and Evaluation for Safe Multi-Objective Policy Improvementcited by 0
  17. 2025Bernstein-von Mises for Adaptively Collected Datacited by 0
  18. 2026Fixed-Horizon Self-Normalized Inference for Adaptive Experiments via Martingale AIPW/DML with Logged Propensitiescited by 0
  19. 2026Bandit Simulation for Average Reward Inferencecited by 0
  20. 2026Experimentation and Commitment under Reward Shiftscited by 0