mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Doubly Robust Interval Estimation for Optimal Policy Evaluation in Online Learning

arXiv 2110.15501 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2021stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the performance of an ongoing policy plays a vital role in many areas such as medicine and economics, to provide crucial instructions on the early-stop of the online experiment and timely feedback from the environment. Policy evaluation in online learning thus attracts increasing attention by inferring the mean outcome of the optimal policy (i.e., the value) in real-time. Yet, such a problem is particularly challenging due to the dependent data generated in the online environment, the unknown optimal policy, and the complex exploration and exploitation trade-off in the adaptive experiment. In this paper, we aim to overcome these difficulties in policy evaluation for online learning. We explicitly derive the probability of exploration that quantifies the probability of exploring non-optimal actions under commonly used bandit algorithms. We use this probability to conduct valid inference on the online conditional mean estimator under each action and develop the doubly robust interval estimation (DREAM) method to infer the value under the estimated optimal policy in online learning. The proposed value estimator provides double protection for consistency and is asymptotically normal with a Wald-type confidence interval provided. Extensive simulation studies and real data applications are conducted to demonstrate the empirical validity of the proposed DREAM method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2021.

Builds on

24 of 59 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
  2. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  3. 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
  4. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
  5. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  6. 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
  7. 2020Inference for Batched Banditscited by 63
  8. 2018Policy Evaluation and Optimization with Continuous Treatmentscited by 57
  9. 2021Statistical Inference with M-Estimators on Adaptively Collected Datacited by 40
  10. 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Banditscited by 40
  11. 2017Accurate Inference for Adaptive Linear Modelscited by 39
  12. 2013Robust Inference on Average Treatment Effects with Possibly More Covariates than Observationscited by 38
12 more
  1. 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
  2. 2015A Survey on Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 34
  3. 2021Post-Contextual-Bandit Inferencecited by 32
  4. 2021Online Bootstrap Inference For Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  5. 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  6. 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
  7. 2018Mitigating Bias in Adaptive Data Gathering via Differential Privacycited by 21
  8. 2021Online Multi-Armed Bandits with Adaptive Inferencecited by 21
  9. 2021Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regressioncited by 20
  10. 2020Statistical Inference for Online Decision-Making: In a Contextual Bandit Settingcited by 17
  11. 2021Bandit Algorithms for Precision Medicinecited by 12
  12. 2019Estimating Treatment Effect under Additive Hazards Models with High-dimensional Covariatescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.