mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SNPL: Simultaneous Policy Learning and Evaluation for Safe Multi-Objective Policy Improvement

arXiv 2503.12760 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025stat.ML cs.LG econ.EMcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

To design effective digital interventions, experimenters face the challenge of learning decision policies that balance multiple objectives using offline data. Often, they aim to develop policies that maximize goal outcomes, while ensuring there are no undesirable changes in guardrail outcomes. To provide credible recommendations, experimenters must not only identify policies that satisfy the desired changes in goal and guardrail outcomes, but also offer probabilistic guarantees about the changes these policies induce. In practice, however, policy classes are often large, and digital experiments tend to produce datasets with small effect sizes relative to noise. In this setting, standard approaches such as data splitting or multiple testing often result in unstable policy selection and/or insufficient statistical power. In this paper, we provide safe noisy policy learning (SNPL), a novel approach that leverages the concept of algorithmic stability to address these challenges. Our method enables policy learning while simultaneously providing high-confidence guarantees using the entire dataset, avoiding the need for data-splitting. We present finite-sample and asymptotic versions of our algorithm that ensure the recommended policy satisfies high-probability guarantees for avoiding guardrail regressions and/or achieving goal outcome improvements. We test both variants of our approach approach empirically on a real-world application of personalizing SMS delivery. Our results on real-world data suggest that our approach offers dramatic improvements in settings with large policy classes and low signal-to-noise across both finite-sample and asymptotic safety guarantees, offering up to 300% improvements in detection rates and 150% improvements in policy gains at significantly smaller sample sizes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

7 of 25 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
  2. 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 144
  3. 2022A Review of Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 95
  4. 2013Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lassocited by 91
  5. 2019Personalized HeartSteps: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Optimizing Physical Activitycited by 70
  6. 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Banditscited by 40
  7. 2021Post-Contextual-Bandit Inferencecited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Trust the Batch, On- or Off-Policy: Adaptive Policy Optimization for RL Post-Training
  2. 2026JumpStart Your Policy Learning with Lessons from 160,000 Training Runs
  3. 2024Decision-Point Guided Safe Policy Improvement
  4. 2026Robust Data-Collection Policy Learning for Low-Variance Online Policy Evaluation
  5. 2019Safe Policy Improvement with an Estimated Baseline Policy
  6. 2026Robust Probabilistic Shielding for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2022Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptive
  8. 2023More for Less: Safe Policy Improvement With Stronger Performance Guarantees