Fixed-Horizon Self-Normalized Inference for Adaptive Experiments via Martingale AIPW/DML with Logged Propensities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adaptive randomized experiments update treatment probabilities as data accrue, but still require an end-of-study interval for the average treatment effect (ATE) at a prespecified horizon. Under adaptive assignment, propensities can keep changing, so the predictable quadratic variation of AIPW/DML score increments may remain random. When no deterministic variance limit exists, Wald statistics normalized by a single long-run variance target can be conditionally miscalibrated given the realized variance regime. We assume no interference, sequential randomization, i.i.d. arrivals, and executed overlap on a prespecified scored set, and we require two auditable pipeline conditions: the platform logs the executed randomization probability for each unit, and the nuisance regressions used to score unit t are constructed predictably from past data only. These conditions make the centered AIPW/DML scores an exact martingale difference sequence. Using self-normalized martingale limit theory, we show that the Studentized statistic, with variance estimated by realized quadratic variation, is asymptotically N(0,1) at the prespecified horizon, even without variance stabilization. Simulations validate the theory and highlight when standard fixed-variance Wald reporting fails.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
14 of 34 references.
References · 14
- 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 220
- 2020Estimating means of bounded random variables by bettingcited by 164
- 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
- 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
- 2020Inference for Batched Banditscited by 63
- 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Banditscited by 40
- 2021Post-Contextual-Bandit Inferencecited by 32
- 2021Time-uniform central limit theory and asymptotic confidence sequencescited by 29
- 2023Semiparametric Efficient Inference in Adaptive Experimentscited by 23
- 2020Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 22
- 2023Double machine learning and design in batch adaptive experimentscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.