mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Text Compression-aided Transformer Encoding

arXiv 2102.05951 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text encoding is one of the most important steps in Natural Language Processing (NLP). It has been done well by the self-attention mechanism in the current state-of-the-art Transformer encoder, which has brought about significant improvements in the performance of many NLP tasks. Though the Transformer encoder may effectively capture general information in its resulting representations, the backbone information, meaning the gist of the input text, is not specifically focused on. In this paper, we propose explicit and implicit text compression approaches to enhance the Transformer encoding and evaluate models using this approach on several typical downstream tasks that rely on the encoding heavily. Our explicit text compression approaches use dedicated models to compress text, while our implicit text compression approach simply adds an additional module to the main model to handle text compression. We propose three ways of integration, namely backbone source-side fusion, target-side fusion, and both-side fusion, to integrate the backbone information into Transformer-based models for various downstream tasks. Our evaluation on benchmark datasets shows that the proposed explicit and implicit text compression approaches improve results in comparison to strong baselines. We therefore conclude, when comparing the encodings to the baseline models, text compression helps the encoders to learn better language representations.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2021.

Builds on

45 of 66 references.

References · 45

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  6. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  8. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  9. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  10. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  11. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  12. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
33 more
  1. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  2. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  3. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  4. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  5. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
  6. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  7. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  8. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  9. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 668
  10. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  11. 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 553
  12. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  13. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  14. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  15. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 394
  16. 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 345
  17. 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 221
  18. 2016Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Wordscited by 114
  19. 2017Controllable Abstractive Summarizationcited by 110
  20. 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
  21. 2016Controlling Output Length in Neural Encoder-Decoderscited by 75
  22. 2015LCSTS: A Large Scale Chinese Short Text Summarization Datasetcited by 65
  23. 2018Did the Model Understand the Question?cited by 60
  24. 2018Modeling Localness for Self-Attention Networkscited by 43
  25. 2018Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questionscited by 31
  26. 2019Context-Aware Self-Attention Networkscited by 25
  27. 2018Exploiting Deep Representations for Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
  28. 2018Unsupervised Sentence Compression using Denoising Auto-Encoderscited by 15
  29. 2014Overcoming the Curse of Sentence Length for Neural Machine Translation using Automatic Segmentationcited by 14
  30. 2019Option Comparison Network for Multiple-choice Reading Comprehensioncited by 14
  31. 2018Learning to Encode Text as Human-Readable Summaries using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 11
  32. 2018U-Net: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questionscited by 5
  33. 2019Exploiting Sentential Context for Neural Machine Translationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: