mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Precise Performance Analysis of Support Vector Regression

arXiv 2105.10373 ↗First posted 21 May 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study the hard and soft support vector regression techniques applied to a set of n linear measurements of the form yi=boldsymbolβ_starTbf xi +ni where boldsymbolβ_star is an unknown vector, leftbf xirighti=1n are the feature vectors and leftnirighti=1n model the noise. Particularly, under some plausible assumptions on the statistical distribution of the data, we characterize the feasibility condition for the hard support vector regression in the regime of high dimensions and, when feasible, derive an asymptotic approximation for its risk. Similarly, we study the test risk for the soft support vector regression as a function of its parameters. Our results are then used to optimally tune the parameters intervening in the design of hard and soft support vector regression algorithms. Based on our analysis, we illustrate that adding more samples may be harmful to the test performance of support vector regression, while it is always beneficial when the parameters are optimally selected. Such a result reminds a similar phenomenon observed in modern learning architectures according to which optimally tuned architectures present a decreasing test performance curve with respect to the number of samples.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2021.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  2. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  3. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  4. 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 195
  5. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
  6. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
  7. 2018Does data interpolation contradict statistical optimality?cited by 95
  8. 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
  9. 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
  10. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 67
  11. 2018Optimal ridge penalty for real-world high-dimensional data can be zero or negative due to the implicit ridge regularizationcited by 53
  12. 2018The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 46
2 more
  1. 2020Analytic Study of Double Descent in Binary Classification: The Impact of Losscited by 28
  2. 2019Understanding overfitting peaks in generalization error: Analytical risk curves for l2 and l1 penalized interpolationcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.