mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do We Really Need to Learn Representations from In-domain Data for Outlier Detection?

arXiv 2105.09270 ↗First posted 19 May 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised outlier detection, which predicts if a test sample is an outlier or not using only the information from unlabelled inlier data, is an important but challenging task. Recently, methods based on the two-stage framework achieve state-of-the-art performance on this task. The framework leverages self-supervised representation learning algorithms to train a feature extractor on inlier data, and applies a simple outlier detector in the feature space. In this paper, we explore the possibility of avoiding the high cost of training a distinct representation for each outlier detection task, and instead using a single pre-trained network as the universal feature extractor regardless of the source of in-domain data. In particular, we replace the task-specific feature extractor by one network pre-trained on ImageNet with a self-supervised loss. In experiments, we demonstrate competitive or better performance on a variety of outlier detection benchmarks compared with previous two-stage methods, suggesting that learning representations from in-domain data may be unnecessary for outlier detection.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2021.

Builds on

63 of 89 references.

References · 63

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  8. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  9. 2020Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 3,229
  10. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  11. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  12. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
38 more
  1. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  2. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  3. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  4. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  5. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  6. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  7. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  8. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  9. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
  10. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  11. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  12. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  13. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
  14. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
  15. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  16. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  17. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
  18. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  19. 2019Deep Learning for Image Super-resolution: A Surveycited by 368
  20. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  21. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
  22. 2018Context Encoding for Semantic Segmentationcited by 289
  23. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
  24. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
  25. 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
  26. 2016Learning Representations for Automatic Colorizationcited by 251
  27. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 224
  28. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
  29. 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 210
  30. 2017Multi-task Self-Supervised Visual Learningcited by 200
  31. 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
  32. 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
  33. 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
  34. 2020CERT: Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Language Understandingcited by 169
  35. 2020Contrastive Learning of General-Purpose Audio Representationscited by 168
  36. 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
  37. 2021TCLR: Temporal Contrastive Learning for Video Representationcited by 136
  38. 2020Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classificationcited by 133

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 9; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: