mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond "Fairness:" Structural (In)justice Lenses on AI for Education

arXiv 2105.08847 ↗First posted 18 May 2021cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Educational technologies, and the systems of schooling in which they are deployed, enact particular ideologies about what is important to know and how learners should learn. As artificial intelligence technologies -- in education and beyond -- may contribute to inequitable outcomes for marginalized communities, various approaches have been developed to evaluate and mitigate the harmful impacts of AI. However, we argue in this paper that the dominant paradigm of evaluating fairness on the basis of performance disparities in AI models is inadequate for confronting the systemic inequities that educational AI systems (re)produce. We draw on a lens of structural injustice informed by critical theory and Black feminist scholarship to critically interrogate several widely-studied and widely-adopted categories of educational AI and explore how they are bound up in and reproduce historical legacies of structural injustice and inequity, regardless of the parity of their models' performance. We close with alternative visions for a more equitable future for educational AI.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 214 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 214 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  2. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  6. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 328
  7. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  8. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  9. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  10. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
  11. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
  12. 2021Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyondcited by 102
10 more
  1. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  2. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
  3. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  4. 2018Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness Metriccited by 61
  5. 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
  6. 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
  7. 2018Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justicecited by 14
  8. 2020What If I Don't Like Any Of The Choices? The Limits of Preference Elicitation for Participatory Algorithm Designcited by 14
  9. 2020Evaluation of Fairness Trade-offs in Predicting Student Successcited by 10
  10. 2019Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCIcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

12 papers.