mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Responsible Artificial Intelligence and Acceptability in Education

arXiv 2402.15027 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the acceptability of different artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education from a multi-stakeholder perspective, including students, teachers, and parents. Acknowledging the transformative potential of AI in education, it addresses concerns related to data privacy, AI agency, transparency, explainability and the ethical deployment of AI. Through a vignette methodology, participants were presented with four scenarios where AI's agency, transparency, explainability, and privacy were manipulated. After each scenario, participants completed a survey that captured their perceptions of AI's global utility, individual usefulness, justice, confidence, risk, and intention to use each scenario's AI if available. The data collection comprising a final sample of 1198 multi-stakeholder participants was distributed through a partner institution and social media campaigns and focused on individual responses to four AI use cases. A mediation analysis of the data indicated that acceptance and trust in AI varies significantly across stakeholder groups. We found that the key mediators between high and low levels of AI's agency, transparency, and explainability, as well as the intention to use the different educational AI, included perceived global utility, justice, and confidence. The study highlights that the acceptance of AI in education is a nuanced and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of specific AI applications and their characteristics, in addition to the diverse stakeholders' perceptions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

12 of 105 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  6. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  7. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
  8. 2019Explainability in Human-Agent Systemscited by 34
  9. 2023A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learningcited by 34
  10. 2024Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated surveycited by 16
  11. 2021Beyond "Fairness:" Structural (In)justice Lenses on AI for Educationcited by 12
  12. 2021Modelling GDPR-Compliant Explanations for Trustworthy AIcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.