mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairness

arXiv 2105.07168 ↗First posted 15 May 2021cs.LG cs.AI econ.EMcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cohort Shapley value is a model-free method of variable importance grounded in game theory that does not use any unobserved and potentially impossible feature combinations. We use it to evaluate algorithmic fairness, using the well known COMPAS recidivism data as our example. This approach allows one to identify for each individual in a data set the extent to which they were adversely or beneficially affected by their value of a protected attribute such as their race. The method can do this even if race was not one of the original predictors and even if it does not have access to a proprietary algorithm that has made the predictions. The grounding in game theory lets us define aggregate variable importance for a data set consistently with its per subject definitions. We can investigate variable importance for multiple quantities of interest in the fairness literature including false positive predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2021.

Builds on

13 of 29 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  5. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  6. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  7. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  8. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  9. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  10. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  11. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
  12. 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
1 more
  1. 2019Explaining black box decisions by Shapley cohort refinementcited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: