Cluster LOCO: Feature Importance For Interpreting Clusters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Clustering is widely used for exploratory analysis and scientific discovery, driving insights from market segmentation to biological data analysis, but its outputs can be difficult to interpret, audit, and reproduce as modern datasets become increasingly large and complex. Reliable use of clustering requires understanding which features drive the discovered structure, yet feature-level explanations for clustering remain scarce compared with methods in supervised learning. Furthermore, existing clustering feature importance scores are often tied to specific algorithms and data assumptions. To address these challenges, we propose Cluster LOCO (Leave-One-Covariate-Out), a family of model-agnostic feature importance scores for clustering. Cluster LOCO is built on feature occlusion and clustering generalizability, defined as whether cluster labels learned on one subset of the data can be accurately predicted on held-out samples. For any chosen clustering algorithm, Cluster LOCO quantifies a feature's importance by measuring how much its removal degrades generalizability. We first introduce Cluster LOCO-Split, which relies on data splitting, and then extend it to Cluster LOCO-MP, a minipatch ensemble-based version designed for large-scale data. Across synthetic simulations and an application to cell-type discovery in single-cell transcriptomics, we show that Cluster LOCO more reliably recovers informative features than existing clustering feature importance methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 70 references.
References · 18
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2019Veridical Data Sciencecited by 66
- 2014Understanding Random Forests: From Theory to Practicecited by 57
- 2019From Clustering to Cluster Explanations via Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2023Feature Importance: A Closer Look at Shapley Values and LOCOcited by 23
- 2014Influential Feature PCA for high dimensional clusteringcited by 14
- 2021Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairnesscited by 13
- 2021Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic frameworkcited by 11
- 2020Feature Selection for Huge Data via Minipatch Learningcited by 9
6 more
- 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Discovery: Statistical Challenges & Opportunitiescited by 7
- 2020MP-Boost: Minipatch Boosting via Adaptive Feature and Observation Samplingcited by 6
- 2025Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretationscited by 4
- 2025iLOCO: Distribution-Free Inference for Feature Interactionscited by 3
- 2021Fast and Interpretable Consensus Clustering via Minipatch Learningcited by 1
- 2026Cluster Analysis with Resampling for Validation and Exploration (CARVE)cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.