mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Feature Importance Scores for Interpreting Tree-Based Methods and Surrogates

arXiv 2310.04352 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Across various sectors such as healthcare, criminal justice, national security, finance, and technology, large-scale machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are being deployed to make critical data-driven decisions. Many have asked if we can and should trust these ML systems to be making these decisions. Two critical components are prerequisites for trust in ML systems: interpretability, or the ability to understand why the ML system makes the decisions it does, and fairness, which ensures that ML systems do not exhibit bias against certain individuals or groups. Both interpretability and fairness are important and have separately received abundant attention in the ML literature, but so far, there have been very few methods developed to directly interpret models with regard to their fairness. In this paper, we focus on arguably the most popular type of ML interpretation: feature importance scores. Inspired by the use of decision trees in knowledge distillation, we propose to leverage trees as interpretable surrogates for complex black-box ML models. Specifically, we develop a novel fair feature importance score for trees that can be used to interpret how each feature contributes to fairness or bias in trees, tree-based ensembles, or tree-based surrogates of any complex ML system. Like the popular mean decrease in impurity for trees, our Fair Feature Importance Score is defined based on the mean decrease (or increase) in group bias. Through simulations as well as real examples on benchmark fairness datasets, we demonstrate that our Fair Feature Importance Score offers valid interpretations for both tree-based ensembles and tree-based surrogates of other ML systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  6. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  9. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  10. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  11. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  12. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
19 more
  1. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  2. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  3. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  4. 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
  5. 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
  6. 2018Deep Neural Decision Treescited by 72
  7. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  8. 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
  9. 2015On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationcited by 47
  10. 2020NBDT: Neural-Backed Decision Treescited by 46
  11. 2020In Pursuit of Interpretable, Fair and Accurate Machine Learning for Criminal Recidivism Predictioncited by 42
  12. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 33
  13. 2019Fair Adversarial Gradient Tree Boostingcited by 17
  14. 2021Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairnesscited by 12
  15. 2020LimeOut: An Ensemble Approach To Improve Process Fairnesscited by 11
  16. 2022To the Fairness Frontier and Beyond: Identifying, Quantifying, and Optimizing the Fairness-Accuracy Pareto Frontiercited by 10
  17. 2019Enhancing Decision Tree based Interpretation of Deep Neural Networks through L1-Orthogonal Regularizationcited by 9
  18. 2021Toward a Taxonomy of Trust for Probabilistic Machine Learningcited by 8
  19. 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Discovery: Statistical Challenges & Opportunitiescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.