Uncertainty Quantification for Local Model Explanations Without Model Access
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a model-agnostic algorithm for generating post-hoc explanations and uncertainty intervals for a machine learning model when only a static sample of inputs and outputs from the model is available, rather than direct access to the model itself. This situation may arise when model evaluations are expensive; when privacy, security and bandwidth constraints are imposed; or when there is a need for real-time, on-device explanations. Our algorithm uses a bootstrapping approach to quantify the uncertainty that inevitably arises when generating explanations from a finite sample of model queries. Through a simulation study, we show that the uncertainty intervals generated by our algorithm exhibit a favorable trade-off between interval width and coverage probability compared to the naive confidence intervals from classical regression analysis as well as current Bayesian approaches for quantifying explanation uncertainty. We further demonstrate the capabilities of our method by applying it to black-box models, including a deep neural network, trained on three real-world datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2023.
Builds on
23 of 43 references.
References · 23
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2019CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertaintycited by 98
11 more
- 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
- 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
- 2019Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learningcited by 37
- 2019U-CAM: Visual Explanation using Uncertainty based Class Activation Mapscited by 36
- 2021Probing GNN Explainers: A Rigorous Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of GNN Explanation Methodscited by 36
- 2020How Much Can I Trust You? -- Quantifying Uncertainties in Explaining Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2020Uncertainty-Aware Deep Ensembles for Reliable and Explainable Predictions of Clinical Time Seriescited by 13
- 2021Cohort Shapley value for algorithmic fairnesscited by 13
- 2021Uncertainty Quantification of Surrogate Explanations: an Ordinal Consensus Approachcited by 6
- 2022Model free variable importance for high dimensional datacited by 3
- 2019Bootstrap Inference for Multiple Imputation under Uncongeniality and Misspecificationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Trustworthy AI Must Account for Interactionscited by 5
- 2025Trustworthy AI Must Account for Interactions9 Apr 2025