Cross-Domain Contract Element Extraction with a Bi-directional Feedback Clause-Element Relation Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contract element extraction (CEE) is the novel task of automatically identifying and extracting legally relevant elements such as contract dates, payments, and legislation references from contracts. Automatic methods for this task view it as a sequence labeling problem and dramatically reduce human labor. However, as contract genres and element types may vary widely, a significant challenge for this sequence labeling task is how to transfer knowledge from one domain to another, i.e., cross-domain CEE. Cross-domain CEE differs from cross-domain named entity recognition (NER) in two important ways. First, contract elements are far more fine-grained than named entities, which hinders the transfer of extractors. Second, the extraction zones for cross-domain CEE are much larger than for cross-domain NER. As a result, the contexts of elements from different domains can be more diverse. We propose a framework, the Bi-directional Feedback cLause-Element relaTion network (Bi-FLEET), for the cross-domain CEE task that addresses the above challenges. Bi-FLEET has three main components: (1) a context encoder, (2) a clause-element relation encoder, and (3) an inference layer. To incorporate invariant knowledge about element and clause types, a clause-element graph is constructed across domains and a hierarchical graph neural network is adopted in the clause-element relation encoder. To reduce the influence of context variations, a multi-task framework with a bi-directional feedback scheme is designed in the inference layer, conducting both clause classification and element extraction. The experimental results over both cross-domain NER and CEE tasks show that Bi-FLEET significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2021.
Builds on
17 of 45 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
- 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
- 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
- 2019Graph Adversarial Training: Dynamically Regularizing Based on Graph Structurecited by 93
- 2017Transfer Learning for Sequence Tagging with Hierarchical Recurrent Networkscited by 30
- 2018NCRF++: An Open-source Neural Sequence Labeling Toolkitcited by 29
- 2020Should Graph Convolution Trust Neighbors? A Simple Causal Inference Methodcited by 25
- 2020Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Modelcited by 24
- 2017Transfer Learning for Named-Entity Recognition with Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2018Neural Adaptation Layers for Cross-domain Named Entity Recognitioncited by 15
5 more
- 2018Legal Document Retrieval using Document Vector Embeddings and Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2017Legal Question Answering using Ranking SVM and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 9
- 2017Effective Use of Bidirectional Language Modeling for Transfer Learning in Biomedical Named Entity Recognitioncited by 8
- 2021Neural Contract Element Extraction Revisited: Letters from Sesame Streetcited by 6
- 2016Named Entity Recognition for Novel Types by Transfer Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
3 papers.