Neural Contract Element Extraction Revisited: Letters from Sesame Street
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate contract element extraction. We show that LSTM-based encoders perform better than dilated CNNs, Transformers, and BERT in this task. We also find that domain-specific WORD2VEC embeddings outperform generic pre-trained GLOVE embeddings. Morpho-syntactic features in the form of POS tag and token shape embeddings, as well as context-aware ELMO embeddings do not improve performance. Several of these observations contradict choices or findings of previous work on contract element extraction and generic sequence labeling tasks, indicating that contract element extraction requires careful task-specific choices. Analyzing the results of (i) plain TRANSFORMER-based and (ii) BERT-based models, we find that in the examined task, where the entities are highly context-sensitive, the lack of recurrency in TRANSFORMERs greatly affects their performance.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2021.
Builds on
10 of 14 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
- 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 544
- 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
- 2015Named Entity Recognition with Bidirectional LSTM-CNNscited by 201
- 2016Neural Machine Translation in Linear Timecited by 65
- 2017Fast and Accurate Entity Recognition with Iterated Dilated Convolutionscited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 302
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 199
- 2022FiNER: Financial Numeric Entity Recognition for XBRL Taggingcited by 47
- 2022ConReader: Exploring Implicit Relations in Contracts for Contract Clause Extractioncited by 5
- 2021Cross-Domain Contract Element Extraction with a Bi-directional Feedback Clause-Element Relation Networkcited by 3
- 2024Extracting Norms from Contracts Via ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challengescited by 2
- 2024Extracting Norms from Contracts Via ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challenges2 Apr 2024
- 2022ConReader: Exploring Implicit Relations in Contracts for Contract Clause Extraction17 Oct 2022
- 2022FiNER: Financial Numeric Entity Recognition for XBRL Tagging12 Mar 2022
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English3 Oct 2021
- 2021Cross-Domain Contract Element Extraction with a Bi-directional Feedback Clause-Element Relation Network13 May 2021
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Dataset18 Apr 2021