mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auditing YouTube's Recommendation Algorithm for Misinformation Filter Bubbles

arXiv 2210.10085 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2022cs.IR cs.LG cs.SIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present results of an auditing study performed over YouTube aimed at investigating how fast a user can get into a misinformation filter bubble, but also what it takes to "burst the bubble", i.e., revert the bubble enclosure. We employ a sock puppet audit methodology, in which pre-programmed agents (acting as YouTube users) delve into misinformation filter bubbles by watching misinformation promoting content. Then they try to burst the bubbles and reach more balanced recommendations by watching misinformation debunking content. We record search results, home page results, and recommendations for the watched videos. Overall, we recorded 17,405 unique videos, out of which we manually annotated 2,914 for the presence of misinformation. The labeled data was used to train a machine learning model classifying videos into three classes (promoting, debunking, neutral) with the accuracy of 0.82. We use the trained model to classify the remaining videos that would not be feasible to annotate manually. Using both the manually and automatically annotated data, we observe the misinformation bubble dynamics for a range of audited topics. Our key finding is that even though filter bubbles do not appear in some situations, when they do, it is possible to burst them by watching misinformation debunking content (albeit it manifests differently from topic to topic). We also observe a sudden decrease of misinformation filter bubble effect when misinformation debunking videos are watched after misinformation promoting videos, suggesting a strong contextuality of recommendations. Finally, when comparing our results with a previous similar study, we do not observe significant improvements in the overall quantity of recommended misinformation content.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.

Builds on

17 of 60 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systemscited by 67
  2. 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 52
  3. 2021Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviorscited by 47
  4. 2019Towards Automatic Detection of Misinformation in Online Medical Videoscited by 22
  5. 2017Measuring Personalization of Web Searchcited by 20
  6. 2021Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Auditscited by 20
  7. 2022An Audit of Misinformation Filter Bubbles on YouTube: Bubble Bursting and Recent Behavior Changescited by 15
  8. 2021Auditing E-Commerce Platforms for Algorithmically Curated Vaccine Misinformationcited by 11
  9. 2022YouTube, The Great Radicalizer? Auditing and Mitigating Ideological Biases in YouTube Recommendationscited by 10
  10. 2016Personality Traits and Echo Chambers on Facebookcited by 9
  11. 2020Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebookcited by 9
  12. 2020"It is just a flu": Assessing the Effect of Watch History on YouTube's Pseudoscientific Video Recommendationscited by 9
5 more
  1. 2015Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformationcited by 8
  2. 2020Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News (Online Disinformation) Detection: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 8
  3. 2021Analysing the Effect of Recommendation Algorithms on the Amplification of Misinformationcited by 4
  4. 2022Conspiracy Brokers: Understanding the Monetization of YouTube Conspiracy Theoriescited by 3
  5. 2021A Study of Fake News Reading and Annotating in Social Media Contextcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.