mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good

arXiv 2105.01774 ↗First posted 4 May 2021cs.CY cs.AIcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research in artificial intelligence (AI) for social good presupposes some definition of social good, but potential definitions have been seldom suggested and never agreed upon. The normative question of what AI for social good research should be "for" is not thoughtfully elaborated, or is frequently addressed with a utilitarian outlook that prioritizes the needs of the majority over those who have been historically marginalized, brushing aside realities of injustice and inequity. We argue that AI for social good ought to be assessed by the communities that the AI system will impact, using as a guide the capabilities approach, a framework to measure the ability of different policies to improve human welfare equity. Furthermore, we lay out how AI research has the potential to catalyze social progress by expanding and equalizing capabilities. We show how the capabilities approach aligns with a participatory approach for the design and implementation of AI for social good research in a framework we introduce called PACT, in which community members affected should be brought in as partners and their input prioritized throughout the project. We conclude by providing an incomplete set of guiding questions for carrying out such participatory AI research in a way that elicits and respects a community's own definition of social good.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.

Builds on

13 of 89 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
  2. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
  3. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  4. 2019Roles for Computing in Social Changecited by 49
  5. 2020Participatory Problem Formulation for Fairer Machine Learning Through Community Based System Dynamicscited by 31
  6. 2020Artificial Intelligence for Social Good: A Surveycited by 29
  7. 2020Towards decolonising computational sciencescited by 17
  8. 2018Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justicecited by 14
  9. 2018Mechanism Design for Social Goodcited by 13
  10. 2019Enabling Value Sensitive AI Systems through Participatory Design Fictionscited by 11
  11. 2020No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversitycited by 8
  12. 2019AI for Social Impact: Learning and Planning in the Data-to-Deployment Pipelinecited by 5
1 more
  1. 2020Combating Anti-Blackness in the AI Communitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 9; 2024: 8; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

29 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Datasetcited by 148
  2. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
  3. 2022In conversation with Artificial Intelligence: aligning language models with human valuescited by 61
  4. 2024Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questionscited by 21
  5. 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Valuescited by 18
  6. 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
  7. 2023Beneficent Intelligence: A Capability Approach to Modeling Benefit, Assistance, and Associated Moral Failures through AI Systemscited by 9
  8. 2024Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefitscited by 9
  9. 2024Towards Foundation-model-based Multiagent System to Accelerate AI for Social Impactcited by 9
  10. 2021Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligencecited by 7
  11. 2022Manifestations of Xenophobia in AI Systemscited by 4
  12. 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"cited by 4
17 more
  1. 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chainscited by 3
  2. 2024The State of Computer Vision Research in Africacited by 3
  3. 2024Surveys Considered Harmful? Reflecting on the Use of Surveys in AI Research, Development, and Governancecited by 3
  4. 2025The Right to AIcited by 3
  5. 2025Secondary Stakeholders in AI: Fighting for, Brokering, and Navigating Agencycited by 3
  6. 2023Towards a Better Understanding of the Computer Vision Research Community in Africacited by 2
  7. 2023Reflections from the Workshop on AI-Assisted Decision Making for Conservationcited by 2
  8. 2025Reflexive Prompt Engineering: A Framework for Responsible Prompt Engineering and Interaction Designcited by 2
  9. 2023For Women, Life, Freedom: A Participatory AI-Based Social Web Analysis of a Watershed Moment in Iran's Gender Strugglescited by 1
  10. 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 1
  11. 2022Participation Interfaces for Human-Centered AIcited by 0
  12. 2024Why Algorithms Remain Unjust: Power Structures Surrounding Algorithmic Activitycited by 0
  13. 2024Social and Ethical Risks Posed by General-Purpose LLMs for Settling Newcomers in Canadacited by 0
  14. 2025RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AIcited by 0
  15. 2026From experimentation to engagement: on the paradox of participatory AI and power in contexts of forced displacement and humanitarian crisescited by 0
  16. 2026Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Goodcited by 0
  17. 2026A Cross Community Agenda for Speech AIcited by 0