Beneficent Intelligence: A Capability Approach to Modeling Benefit, Assistance, and Associated Moral Failures through AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The prevailing discourse around AI ethics lacks the language and formalism necessary to capture the diverse ethical concerns that emerge when AI systems interact with individuals. Drawing on Sen and Nussbaum's capability approach, we present a framework formalizing a network of ethical concepts and entitlements necessary for AI systems to confer meaningful benefit or assistance to stakeholders. Such systems enhance stakeholders' ability to advance their life plans and well-being while upholding their fundamental rights. We characterize two necessary conditions for morally permissible interactions between AI systems and those impacted by their functioning, and two sufficient conditions for realizing the ideal of meaningful benefit. We then contrast this ideal with several salient failure modes, namely, forms of social interactions that constitute unjustified paternalism, coercion, deception, exploitation and domination. The proliferation of incidents involving AI in high-stakes domains underscores the gravity of these issues and the imperative to take an ethics-led approach to AI systems from their inception.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.
Builds on
9 of 96 references.
References · 9
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
- 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
- 2021Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Goodcited by 30
- 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
- 2019Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websitescited by 19
- 2021What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark? Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Measurement Methodscited by 15
- 2022Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research Contributions, Shortcomings, and Future Prospectscited by 14
- 2020Whose Side are Ethics Codes On? Power, Responsibility and the Social Goodcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignmentcited by 49
- 2024A Robot Walks into a Bar: Can Language Models Serve as Creativity Support Tools for Comedy? An Evaluation of LLMs' Humour Alignment with Comedianscited by 29
- 2025Full-Stack Alignment: Co-Aligning AI and Institutions with Thick Models of Valuecited by 6
- 2023Kantian Deontology Meets AI Alignment: Towards Morally Grounded Fairness Metricscited by 1
- 2025A Capability Approach to AI Ethicscited by 1
- 2025Model-Based Soft Maximization of Suitable Metrics of Long-Term Human Powercited by 1
- 2025Three Kinds of AI Ethicscited by 0
- 2026The Illusion of Opting in AI-Mediated Consequential Decisionscited by 0
- 2026A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequencescited by 0
- 2026A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequences8 Aug 2026
- 2026The Illusion of Opting in AI-Mediated Consequential Decisions27 May 2026
- 2025Full-Stack Alignment: Co-Aligning AI and Institutions with Thick Models of Value3 Dec 2025
- 2025Model-Based Soft Maximization of Suitable Metrics of Long-Term Human Power31 Jul 2025
- 2025Three Kinds of AI Ethics24 Mar 2025
- 2025A Capability Approach to AI Ethics10 Jan 2025
- 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment30 Aug 2024
- 2024A Robot Walks into a Bar: Can Language Models Serve as Creativity Support Tools for Comedy? An Evaluation of LLMs' Humour Alignment with Comedians31 May 2024
- 2023Kantian Deontology Meets AI Alignment: Towards Morally Grounded Fairness Metrics9 Nov 2023