mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AI

arXiv 2508.20176 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Participatory AI, in which impacted community members and other stakeholders are involved in the design and development of AI systems, holds promise as a way to ensure AI is developed to meet their needs and reflect their values. However, the process of identifying, reaching out, and engaging with all relevant stakeholder groups, which we refer to as recruitment methodology, is still a practical challenge in AI projects striving to adopt participatory practices. In this paper, we investigate the challenges that researchers face when designing and executing recruitment methodology for Participatory AI projects, and the implications of current recruitment practice for Participatory AI. First, we describe the recruitment methodologies used in AI projects using a corpus of 37 projects to capture the diversity of practices in the field and perform an initial analysis on the documentation of recruitment practices, as well as specific strategies that researchers use to meet goals of equity and empowerment. To complement this analysis, we interview five AI researchers to learn about the outcomes of recruitment methodologies. We find that these outcomes are shaped by structural conditions of their work, researchers' own goals and expectations, and the relationships built from the recruitment methodology and subsequent collaboration. Based on these analyses, we provide recommendations for designing and executing relationship-forward recruitment methods, as well as reflexive recruitment documentation practices for Participatory AI researchers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

19 of 89 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
  2. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  3. 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 138
  4. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 111
  5. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 101
  6. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
  7. 2019"The Human Body is a Black Box": Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learningcited by 39
  8. 2020Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Valuescited by 36
  9. 2021Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Goodcited by 30
  10. 2021Soliciting Stakeholders' Fairness Notions in Child Maltreatment Predictive Systemscited by 27
  11. 2019Enabling Value Sensitive AI Systems through Participatory Design Fictionscited by 11
  12. 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
7 more
  1. 2020Clinical trial of an AI-augmented intervention for HIV prevention in youth experiencing homelessnesscited by 10
  2. 2022An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AIcited by 10
  3. 2024From Fitting Participation to Forging Relationships: The Art of Participatory MLcited by 8
  4. 2020Rapid Damage Assessment Using Social Media Images by Combining Human and Machine Intelligencecited by 7
  5. 2023Participation and Division of Labor in User-Driven Algorithm Audits: How Do Everyday Users Work together to Surface Algorithmic Harms?cited by 4
  6. 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"cited by 4
  7. 2024"Come to us first": Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnershipscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.