mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tackling Variabilities in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2104.10415 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2021cs.AR cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → End-to-end system architecture

Abstract (arXiv)

The state-of-the-art driving automation system demands extreme computational resources to meet rigorous accuracy and latency requirements. Though emerging driving automation computing platforms are based on ASIC to provide better performance and power guarantee, building such an accelerator-based computing platform for driving automation still present challenges. First, the workloads mix and performance requirements exposed to driving automation system present significant variability. Second, with more cameras/sensors integrated in a future fully autonomous driving vehicle, a heterogeneous multi-accelerator architecture substrate is needed that requires a design space exploration for a new form of parallelism. In this work, we aim to extensively explore the above system design challenges and these challenges motivate us to propose a comprehensive framework that synergistically handles the heterogeneous hardware accelerator design principles, system design criteria, and task scheduling mechanism. Specifically, we propose a novel heterogeneous multi-core AI accelerator (HMAI) to provide the hardware substrate for the driving automation tasks with variability. We also define system design criteria to better utilize hardware resources and achieve increased throughput while satisfying the performance and energy restrictions. Finally, we propose a deep reinforcement learning (RL)-based task scheduling mechanism FlexAI, to resolve task mapping issue. Experimental results show that with FlexAI scheduling, basically 100% tasks in each driving route can be processed by HMAI within their required period to ensure safety, and FlexAI can also maximally reduce the breaking distance up to 96% as compared to typical heuristics and guided random-search-based algorithms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2021.

Builds on

23 of 81 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  5. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  6. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  7. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  8. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  9. 2015Deep Learning with Limited Numerical Precisioncited by 368
  10. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
  11. 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 229
  12. 2018The ApolloScape Open Dataset for Autonomous Driving and its Applicationcited by 188
11 more
  1. 2017DSSD : Deconvolutional Single Shot Detectorcited by 130
  2. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
  3. 2016Learning to Track at 100 FPS with Deep Regression Networkscited by 89
  4. 2016Learning a Driving Simulatorcited by 33
  5. 2017Policy Gradient Methods for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation and Action-Dependent Baselinescited by 20
  6. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Dynamic Trajectory Control for UAV-assisted Mobile Edge Computingcited by 16
  7. 2019REQ-YOLO: A Resource-Aware, Efficient Quantization Framework for Object Detection on FPGAscited by 13
  8. 2015Origami: A 803 GOp/s/W Convolutional Network Acceleratorcited by 6
  9. 2018Inference of Quantized Neural Networks on Heterogeneous All-Programmable Devicescited by 4
  10. 2019Towards Safety-Aware Computing System Design in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
  11. 2019Accelerator-level Parallelismcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Romanus: Robust Task Offloading in Modular Multi-Sensor Autonomous Driving Systems
  2. 2022AutoDRIVE: A Comprehensive, Flexible and Integrated Digital Twin Ecosystem for Enhancing Autonomous Driving Research and Education
  3. 2025AlphaDrive: Unleashing the Power of VLMs in Autonomous Driving via Reinforcement Learning and Reasoning
  4. 2021Multi-task UNet architecture for end-to-end autonomous driving
  5. 2024Self-Driving Car Racing: Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025A Comprehensive Review of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving in the CARLA Simulator
  7. 2022Tackling Real-World Autonomous Driving using Deep Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2023Towards Sim2Real Transfer of Autonomy Algorithms using AutoDRIVE Ecosystem