mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Mathematical Analysis of Learning Loss for Active Learning in Regression

arXiv 2104.09315 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning continues to remain significant in the industry since it is data efficient. Not only is it cost effective on a constrained budget, continuous refinement of the model allows for early detection and resolution of failure scenarios during the model development stage. Identifying and fixing failures with the model is crucial as industrial applications demand that the underlying model performs accurately in all foreseeable use cases. One popular state-of-the-art technique that specializes in continuously refining the model via failure identification is Learning Loss. Although simple and elegant, this approach is empirically motivated. Our paper develops a foundation for Learning Loss which enables us to propose a novel modification we call LearningLoss++. We show that gradients are crucial in interpreting how Learning Loss works, with rigorous analysis and comparison of the gradients between Learning Loss and LearningLoss++. We also propose a convolutional architecture that combines features at different scales to predict the loss. We validate LearningLoss++ for regression on the task of human pose estimation (using MPII and LSP datasets), as done in Learning Loss. We show that LearningLoss++ outperforms in identifying scenarios where the model is likely to perform poorly, which on model refinement translates into reliable performance in the open world.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2021.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
  4. 2016Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimationcited by 913
  5. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  6. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  7. 2013DeepPose: Human Pose Estimation via Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
  8. 2014Joint Training of a Convolutional Network and a Graphical Model for Human Pose Estimationcited by 129
  9. 2018Adversarial Sampling for Active Learningcited by 51
  10. 2020Active Learning for Bayesian 3D Hand Pose Estimationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.