mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Critic Loss for Image Classification

arXiv 2409.15565 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern neural network classifiers achieve remarkable performance across a variety of tasks; however, they frequently exhibit overconfidence in their predictions due to the cross-entropy loss. Inspired by this problem, we propose the Critic Loss for Image Classification (CrtCl, pronounced Critical). CrtCl formulates image classification training in a generator-critic framework, with a base classifier acting as a generator, and a correctness critic imposing a loss on the classifier. The base classifier, acting as the generator, given images, generates the probability distribution over classes and intermediate embeddings. The critic model, given the image, intermediate embeddings, and output predictions of the base model, predicts the probability that the base model has produced the correct classification, which then can be back propagated as a self supervision signal. Notably, the critic does not use the label as input, meaning that the critic can train the base model on both labeled and unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning settings. CrtCl represents a learned loss method for accuracy, alleviating the negative side effects of using cross-entropy loss. Additionally, CrtCl provides a powerful way to select data to be labeled in an active learning setting, by estimating the classification ability of the base model on unlabeled data. We study the effectiveness of CrtCl in low-labeled data regimes, and in the context of active learning. In classification, we find that CrtCl, compared to recent baselines, increases classifier generalization and calibration with various amounts of labeled data. In active learning, we show our method outperforms baselines in accuracy and calibration. We observe consistent results across three image classification datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  8. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  9. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  10. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  11. 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
  12. 2019Be Your Own Teacher: Improve the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Self Distillationcited by 491
16 more
  1. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  2. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  3. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  4. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  5. 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
  6. 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 89
  7. 2023Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 72
  8. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
  9. 2021Semi-Supervised Active Learning with Temporal Output Discrepancycited by 50
  10. 2021Triggering Failures: Out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
  11. 2021JEM++: Improved Techniques for Training JEMcited by 28
  12. 2022PT4AL: Using Self-Supervised Pretext Tasks for Active Learningcited by 27
  13. 2016Active and Continuous Exploration with Deep Neural Networks and Expected Model Output Changescited by 18
  14. 2021A Mathematical Analysis of Learning Loss for Active Learning in Regressioncited by 3
  15. 2016Estimating Uncertainty Online Against an Adversarycited by 2
  16. 2022Temporal Output Discrepancy for Loss Estimation-based Active Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.