mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbations to End-to-end ASR Models

arXiv 2104.02757 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2021eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although end-to-end automatic speech recognition (e2e ASR) models are widely deployed in many applications, there have been very few studies to understand models' robustness against adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we explore whether a targeted universal perturbation vector exists for e2e ASR models. Our goal is to find perturbations that can mislead the models to predict the given targeted transcript such as "thank you" or empty string on any input utterance. We study two different attacks, namely additive and prepending perturbations, and their performances on the state-of-the-art LAS, CTC and RNN-T models. We find that LAS is the most vulnerable to perturbations among the three models. RNN-T is more robust against additive perturbations, especially on long utterances. And CTC is robust against both additive and prepending perturbations. To attack RNN-T, we find prepending perturbation is more effective than the additive perturbation, and can mislead the models to predict the same short target on utterances of arbitrary length.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2021.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,838
  6. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
  7. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  8. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  9. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  10. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  11. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  12. 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 123
9 more
  1. 2019Lingvo: a Modular and Scalable Framework for Sequence-to-Sequence Modelingcited by 86
  2. 2017Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Modelscited by 50
  3. 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
  4. 2020SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification Systemscited by 46
  5. 2019Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Speech Recognition Systemscited by 41
  6. 2019Practical Hidden Voice Attacks against Speech and Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 34
  7. 2020Real-time, Universal, and Robust Adversarial Attacks Against Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 26
  8. 2019Universal Adversarial Audio Perturbationscited by 11
  9. 2019Universal adversarial examples in speech command classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

10 papers.