Universal Adversarial Audio Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We demonstrate the existence of universal adversarial perturbations, which can fool a family of audio classification architectures, for both targeted and untargeted attack scenarios. We propose two methods for finding such perturbations. The first method is based on an iterative, greedy approach that is well-known in computer vision: it aggregates small perturbations to the input so as to push it to the decision boundary. The second method, which is the main contribution of this work, is a novel penalty formulation, which finds targeted and untargeted universal adversarial perturbations. Differently from the greedy approach, the penalty method minimizes an appropriate objective function on a batch of samples. Therefore, it produces more successful attacks when the number of training samples is limited. Moreover, we provide a proof that the proposed penalty method theoretically converges to a solution that corresponds to universal adversarial perturbations. We also demonstrate that it is possible to provide successful attacks using the penalty method when only one sample from the target dataset is available for the attacker. Experimental results on attacking various 1D CNN architectures have shown attack success rates higher than 85.0% and 83.1% for targeted and untargeted attacks, respectively using the proposed penalty method.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Exploring Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbations to End-to-end ASR Modelscited by 10
- 2023Malafide: a novel adversarial convolutive noise attack against deepfake and spoofing detection systemscited by 10
- 2021Realizable Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Malwarecited by 5
- 2021SoK: A Modularized Approach to Study the Security of Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 4
- 2025Breaking Audio Large Language Models by Attacking Only the Encoder: A Universal Targeted Latent-Space Audio Attackcited by 4
- 2022Privacy against Real-Time Speech Emotion Detection via Acoustic Adversarial Evasion of Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2022Attacks as Defenses: Designing Robust Audio CAPTCHAs Using Attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 1
- 2021Cortical Features for Defense Against Adversarial Audio Attackscited by 0
- 2023AudioFool: Fast, Universal and synchronization-free Cross-Domain Attack on Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Are Deep Speech Denoising Models Robust to Adversarial Noise?cited by 0
- 2026Hearing the Unspoken: Language Model Priors for Acoustic Adversarial Attackscited by 0
- 2026Hearing the Unspoken: Language Model Priors for Acoustic Adversarial Attacks5 Jun 2026
- 2025Breaking Audio Large Language Models by Attacking Only the Encoder: A Universal Targeted Latent-Space Audio Attack29 Dec 2025
- 2025Are Deep Speech Denoising Models Robust to Adversarial Noise?14 Mar 2025
- 2023AudioFool: Fast, Universal and synchronization-free Cross-Domain Attack on Speech Recognition20 Sep 2023
- 2023Malafide: a novel adversarial convolutive noise attack against deepfake and spoofing detection systems13 Jun 2023
- 2022Privacy against Real-Time Speech Emotion Detection via Acoustic Adversarial Evasion of Machine Learning17 Nov 2022
- 2022Attacks as Defenses: Designing Robust Audio CAPTCHAs Using Attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition Systems10 Mar 2022
- 2021Exploring Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbations to End-to-end ASR Models6 Apr 2021
- 2021SoK: A Modularized Approach to Study the Security of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems19 Mar 2021
- 2021Realizable Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Malware12 Feb 2021
- 2021Cortical Features for Defense Against Adversarial Audio Attacks30 Jan 2021