mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy Information Capacity: Information-Theoretic Measure for Task Complexity in Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2103.12726 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Progress in deep reinforcement learning (RL) research is largely enabled by benchmark task environments. However, analyzing the nature of those environments is often overlooked. In particular, we still do not have agreeable ways to measure the difficulty or solvability of a task, given that each has fundamentally different actions, observations, dynamics, rewards, and can be tackled with diverse RL algorithms. In this work, we propose policy information capacity (PIC) -- the mutual information between policy parameters and episodic return -- and policy-optimal information capacity (POIC) -- between policy parameters and episodic optimality -- as two environment-agnostic, algorithm-agnostic quantitative metrics for task difficulty. Evaluating our metrics across toy environments as well as continuous control benchmark tasks from OpenAI Gym and DeepMind Control Suite, we empirically demonstrate that these information-theoretic metrics have higher correlations with normalized task solvability scores than a variety of alternatives. Lastly, we show that these metrics can also be used for fast and compute-efficient optimizations of key design parameters such as reward shaping, policy architectures, and MDP properties for better solvability by RL algorithms without ever running full RL experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2021.

Builds on

52 of 79 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  5. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  6. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  7. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  8. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  9. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  10. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  11. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  12. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
38 more
  1. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
  3. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  4. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  5. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  6. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
  7. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  8. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  9. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
  10. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  11. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  12. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  13. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 466
  14. 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
  15. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  16. 2019Dynamics-Aware Unsupervised Discovery of Skillscited by 308
  17. 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
  18. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
  19. 2019Skew-Fit: State-Covering Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
  20. 2016Continuous Deep Q-Learning with Model-based Accelerationcited by 149
  21. 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
  22. 2017A Bayesian Perspective on Generalization and Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 134
  23. 2019Fast Task Inference with Variational Intrinsic Successor Featurescited by 131
  24. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 129
  25. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
  26. 2017Stochastic Neural Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
  27. 2020Explore, Discover and Learn: Unsupervised Discovery of State-Covering Skillscited by 120
  28. 2018Near-Optimal Representation Learning for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 107
  29. 2015Sample Complexity of Episodic Fixed-Horizon Reinforcement Learningcited by 105
  30. 2018Unsupervised Control Through Non-Parametric Discriminative Rewardscited by 102
  31. 2016Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-controlcited by 100
  32. 2018Temporal Difference Models: Model-Free Deep RL for Model-Based Controlcited by 89
  33. 2016Q-Prop: Sample-Efficient Policy Gradient with An Off-Policy Criticcited by 77
  34. 2018On Oracle-Efficient PAC RL with Rich Observationscited by 71
  35. 2017Towards Generalization and Simplicity in Continuous Controlcited by 65
  36. 2017Interpolated Policy Gradient: Merging On-Policy and Off-Policy Gradient Estimation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  37. 2020Action and Perception as Divergence Minimizationcited by 31
  38. 2020Emergent Real-World Robotic Skills via Unsupervised Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 30

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: