mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exact Gap between Generalization Error and Uniform Convergence in Random Feature Models

arXiv 2103.04554 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2021cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work showed that there could be a large gap between the classical uniform convergence bound and the actual test error of zero-training-error predictors (interpolators) such as deep neural networks. To better understand this gap, we study the uniform convergence in the nonlinear random feature model and perform a precise theoretical analysis on how uniform convergence depends on the sample size and the number of parameters. We derive and prove analytical expressions for three quantities in this model: 1) classical uniform convergence over norm balls, 2) uniform convergence over interpolators in the norm ball (recently proposed by Zhou et al. (2020)), and 3) the risk of minimum norm interpolator. We show that, in the setting where the classical uniform convergence bound is vacuous (diverges to ∞), uniform convergence over the interpolators still gives a non-trivial bound of the test error of interpolating solutions. We also showcase a different setting where classical uniform convergence bound is non-vacuous, but uniform convergence over interpolators can give an improved sample complexity guarantee. Our result provides a first exact comparison between the test errors and uniform convergence bounds for interpolators beyond simple linear models.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2021.

Builds on

42 of 66 references.

References · 42

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  4. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  5. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  6. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  7. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
  8. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  9. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  10. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  11. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  12. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
30 more
  1. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  2. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
  3. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  4. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
  5. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  6. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  7. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
  8. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  9. 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
  10. 2020When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?cited by 150
  11. 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 140
  12. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
  13. 2021Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentrationcited by 110
  14. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  15. 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
  16. 2018Does data interpolation contradict statistical optimality?cited by 95
  17. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  18. 2020Towards a Mathematical Understanding of Neural Network-Based Machine Learning: what we know and what we don'tcited by 94
  19. 2017A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networkscited by 80
  20. 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
  21. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  22. 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
  23. 2020Kernel Alignment Risk Estimator: Risk Prediction from Training Datacited by 54
  24. 2019Deterministic PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for deep networks via generalizing noise-resiliencecited by 51
  25. 2019Machine Learning from a Continuous Viewpointcited by 50
  26. 2019In Defense of Uniform Convergence: Generalization via derandomization with an application to interpolating predictorscited by 44
  27. 2020Failures of model-dependent generalization bounds for least-norm interpolationcited by 26
  28. 2020On Uniform Convergence and Low-Norm Interpolation Learningcited by 24
  29. 2019On the Multiple Descent of Minimum-Norm Interpolants and Restricted Lower Isometry of Kernelscited by 7
  30. 2019Rademacher complexity and spin glasses: A link between the replica and statistical theories of learningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: