mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Impacts of High-Order Loss Approximations and Features in Deep Learning Interpretation

arXiv 1902.00407 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current methods to interpret deep learning models by generating saliency maps generally rely on two key assumptions. First, they use first-order approximations of the loss function neglecting higher-order terms such as the loss curvatures. Second, they evaluate each feature's importance in isolation, ignoring their inter-dependencies. In this work, we study the effect of relaxing these two assumptions. First, by characterizing a closed-form formula for the Hessian matrix of a deep ReLU network, we prove that, for a classification problem with a large number of classes, if an input has a high confidence classification score, the inclusion of the Hessian term has small impacts in the final solution. We prove this result by showing that in this case the Hessian matrix is approximately of rank one and its leading eigenvector is almost parallel to the gradient of the loss function. Our empirical experiments on ImageNet samples are consistent with our theory. This result can have implications in other related problems such as adversarial examples as well. Second, we compute the importance of group-features in deep learning interpretation by introducing a sparsity regularization term. We use the L0-L1 relaxation technique along with the proximal gradient descent to have an efficient computation of group feature importance scores. Our empirical results indicate that considering group features can improve deep learning interpretation significantly.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?cited by 114
  2. 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
  3. 2022ProtoPFormer: Concentrating on Prototypical Parts in Vision Transformers for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 63
  4. 2021Sketching Curvature for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 32
  5. 2021SSSE: Efficiently Erasing Samples from Trained Machine Learning Modelscited by 28
  6. 2022Understanding and Combating Robust Overfitting via Input Loss Landscape Analysis and Regularizationcited by 22
  7. 2022Core Risk Minimization using Salient ImageNetcited by 15
  8. 2021Token-Modification Adversarial Attacks for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 12
  9. 2023SMOOT: Saliency Guided Mask Optimized Online Trainingcited by 8
  10. 2022A Survey of Neural Treescited by 7
  11. 2021Interpretable Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Feature Interactioncited by 5
  12. 2021Improving Attribution Methods by Learning Submodular Functionscited by 5
10 more
  1. 2023SmoothHess: ReLU Network Feature Interactions via Stein's Lemmacited by 5
  2. 2022Data-Centric Debugging: mitigating model failures via targeted data collectioncited by 3
  3. 2024On Dissipativity of Cross-Entropy Loss in Training ResNetscited by 1
  4. 2024Unraveling the Hessian: A Key to Smooth Convergence in Loss Function Landscapescited by 1
  5. 2026H-Sets: Hessian-Guided Discovery of Set-Level Feature Interactions in Image Classifierscited by 1
  6. 2023MaskSearch: Querying Image Masks at Scalecited by 0
  7. 2023Deep Metric Tensor Regularized Policy Gradientcited by 0
  8. 2023Reducing Adversarial Training Cost with Gradient Approximationcited by 0
  9. 2025Aerial Image Classification in Scarce and Unconstrained Environments via Conformal Predictioncited by 0
  10. 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularizationcited by 0