mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Error-controlled non-additive interaction discovery in machine learning models

arXiv 2408.17016 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2024cs.LG stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) models are powerful tools for detecting complex patterns within data, yet their "black box" nature limits their interpretability, hindering their use in critical domains like healthcare and finance. To address this challenge, interpretable ML methods have been developed to explain how features influence model predictions. However, these methods often focus on univariate feature importance, overlooking the complex interactions between features that ML models are capable of capturing. Recognizing this limitation, recent efforts have aimed to extend these methods to discover feature interactions, but existing approaches struggle with robustness and error control, especially under data perturbations. In this study, we introduce Diamond, a novel method for trustworthy feature interaction discovery. Diamond uniquely integrates the model-X knockoffs framework to control the false discovery rate (FDR), ensuring that the proportion of falsely discovered interactions remains low. A key innovation in Diamond is its non-additivity distillation procedure, which refines existing interaction importance measures to distill non-additive interaction effects, ensuring that FDR control is maintained. This approach addresses the limitations of off-the-shelf interaction measures, which, when used naively, can lead to inaccurate discoveries. Diamond's applicability spans a wide range of ML models, including deep neural networks, transformer models, tree-based models, and factorization-based models. Our empirical evaluations on both simulated and real datasets across various biomedical studies demonstrate Diamond's utility in enabling more reliable data-driven scientific discoveries. This method represents a significant step forward in the deployment of ML models for scientific innovation and hypothesis generation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.

Builds on

25 of 71 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  8. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  9. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  10. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  11. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  12. 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 120
13 more
  1. 2020Explaining Explanations: Axiomatic Feature Interactions for Deep Networkscited by 103
  2. 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
  3. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  4. 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
  5. 2017Iterative Random Forests to detect predictive and stable high-order interactionscited by 42
  6. 2018DeepPINK: reproducible feature selection in deep neural networkscited by 41
  7. 2018Deep Knockoffscited by 40
  8. 2020DANCE: Enhancing saliency maps using decoyscited by 10
  9. 2018Auto-Encoding Knockoff Generator for FDR Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 8
  10. 2020Explaining Local, Global, And Higher-Order Interactions In Deep Learningcited by 8
  11. 2019Learning Global Pairwise Interactions with Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 6
  12. 2021Interpretable Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Feature Interactioncited by 5
  13. 2024When Knockoffs fail: diagnosing and fixing non-exchangeability of Knockoffscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.