Credit Assignment with Meta-Policy Gradient for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward decomposition is a critical problem in centralized training with decentralized execution~(CTDE) paradigm for multi-agent reinforcement learning. To take full advantage of global information, which exploits the states from all agents and the related environment for decomposing Q values into individual credits, we propose a general meta-learning-based Mixing Network with Meta Policy Gradient~(MNMPG) framework to distill the global hierarchy for delicate reward decomposition. The excitation signal for learning global hierarchy is deduced from the episode reward difference between before and after "exercise updates" through the utility network. Our method is generally applicable to the CTDE method using a monotonic mixing network. Experiments on the StarCraft II micromanagement benchmark demonstrate that our method just with a simple utility network is able to outperform the current state-of-the-art MARL algorithms on 4 of 5 super hard scenarios. Better performance can be further achieved when combined with a role-based utility network.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2021.
Builds on
30 of 42 references.
References · 30
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
- 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
18 more
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
- 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
- 2018Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
- 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 135
- 2020RODE: Learning Roles to Decompose Multi-Agent Taskscited by 125
- 2017Stabilising Experience Replay for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
- 2018On Learning Intrinsic Rewards for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 100
- 2020Qatten: A General Framework for Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
- 2020Towards Playing Full MOBA Games with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
- 2020Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 55
- 2019Discovery of Useful Questions as Auxiliary Taskscited by 45
- 2020Online Meta-Critic Learning for Off-Policy Actor-Critic Methodscited by 17
- 2019SMIX(λ): Enhancing Centralized Value Functions for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2019Exploration with Unreliable Intrinsic Reward in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2020Joint Policy Search for Multi-agent Collaboration with Imperfect Informationcited by 13
- 2020Learning Implicit Credit Assignment for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2018Learning to Explore with Meta-Policy Gradientcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.
2 papers.