Does Typological Blinding Impede Cross-Lingual Sharing?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bridging the performance gap between high- and low-resource languages has been the focus of much previous work. Typological features from databases such as the World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) are a prime candidate for this, as such data exists even for very low-resource languages. However, previous work has only found minor benefits from using typological information. Our hypothesis is that a model trained in a cross-lingual setting will pick up on typological cues from the input data, thus overshadowing the utility of explicitly using such features. We verify this hypothesis by blinding a model to typological information, and investigate how cross-lingual sharing and performance is impacted. Our model is based on a cross-lingual architecture in which the latent weights governing the sharing between languages is learnt during training. We show that (i) preventing this model from exploiting typology severely reduces performance, while a control experiment reaffirms that (ii) encouraging sharing according to typology somewhat improves performance.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2021.
Builds on
26 of 35 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 742
- 2020Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTcited by 110
- 2020Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer with Meta Learningcited by 66
- 2018Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processingcited by 63
- 2019The Limitations of Adversarial Training and the Blind-Spot Attackcited by 63
- 2019Stateful Detection of Black-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 56
- 2020Inducing Language-Agnostic Multilingual Representationscited by 48
14 more
- 2017Learning Language Representations for Typology Predictioncited by 40
- 2016Many Languages, One Parsercited by 26
- 2017Generalisation in Named Entity Recognition: A Quantitative Analysiscited by 25
- 2020What does it mean to be language-agnostic? Probing multilingual sentence encoders for typological propertiescited by 23
- 2020Bridging Linguistic Typology and Multilingual Machine Translation with Multi-View Language Representationscited by 21
- 2016Continuous multilinguality with language vectorscited by 20
- 2019What do Language Representations Really Represent?cited by 17
- 2018From Phonology to Syntax: Unsupervised Linguistic Typology at Different Levels with Language Embeddingscited by 13
- 2020SIGTYP 2020 Shared Task: Prediction of Typological Featurescited by 13
- 2019A Probabilistic Generative Model of Linguistic Typologycited by 8
- 2017Tracking Typological Traits of Uralic Languages in Distributed Language Representationscited by 7
- 2016Survey on the Use of Typological Information in Natural Language Processingcited by 6
- 2018Parameter sharing between dependency parsers for related languagescited by 5
- 2019Uncovering Probabilistic Implications in Typological Knowledge Basescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Difference in Multilingual BERT: How Good is It and How Does It Affect Transfer?cited by 10
- 2023Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizationscited by 9
- 2021Language Embeddings for Typology and Cross-lingual Transfer Learningcited by 8
- 2023Are Structural Concepts Universal in Transformer Language Models? Towards Interpretable Cross-Lingual Generalizationcited by 6
- 2022Word-order typology in Multilingual BERT: A case study in subordinate-clause detectioncited by 3
- 2023Colexifications for Bootstrapping Cross-lingual Datasets: The Case of Phonology, Concreteness, and Affectivenesscited by 2
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2021Do Multi-Lingual Pre-trained Language Models Reveal Consistent Token Attributions in Different Languages?cited by 0
- 2024Patterns of Persistence and Diffusibility across the World's Languagescited by 0
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models9 Jan 2026
- 2024Patterns of Persistence and Diffusibility across the World's Languages3 Jan 2024
- 2023Are Structural Concepts Universal in Transformer Language Models? Towards Interpretable Cross-Lingual Generalization19 Oct 2023
- 2023Colexifications for Bootstrapping Cross-lingual Datasets: The Case of Phonology, Concreteness, and Affectiveness5 Jun 2023
- 2023Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizations19 Jan 2023
- 2022Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Difference in Multilingual BERT: How Good is It and How Does It Affect Transfer?21 Dec 2022
- 2022Word-order typology in Multilingual BERT: A case study in subordinate-clause detection24 May 2022
- 2021Do Multi-Lingual Pre-trained Language Models Reveal Consistent Token Attributions in Different Languages?23 Dec 2021
- 2021Language Embeddings for Typology and Cross-lingual Transfer Learning3 Jun 2021