mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Colexifications for Bootstrapping Cross-lingual Datasets: The Case of Phonology, Concreteness, and Affectiveness

arXiv 2306.02646 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Colexification refers to the linguistic phenomenon where a single lexical form is used to convey multiple meanings. By studying cross-lingual colexifications, researchers have gained valuable insights into fields such as psycholinguistics and cognitive sciences [Jackson et al.,2019]. While several multilingual colexification datasets exist, there is untapped potential in using this information to bootstrap datasets across such semantic features. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate how colexifications can be leveraged to create such cross-lingual datasets. We showcase curation procedures which result in a dataset covering 142 languages across 21 language families across the world. The dataset includes ratings of concreteness and affectiveness, mapped with phonemes and phonological features. We further analyze the dataset along different dimensions to demonstrate potential of the proposed procedures in facilitating further interdisciplinary research in psychology, cognitive science, and multilingual natural language processing (NLP). Based on initial investigations, we observe that i) colexifications that are closer in concreteness/affectiveness are more likely to colexify; ii) certain initial/last phonemes are significantly correlated with concreteness/affectiveness intra language families, such as /k/ as the initial phoneme in both Turkic and Tai-Kadai correlated with concreteness, and /p/ in Dravidian and Sino-Tibetan correlated with Valence; iii) the type-to-token ratio (TTR) of phonemes are positively correlated with concreteness across several language families, while the length of phoneme segments are negatively correlated with concreteness; iv) certain phonological features are negatively correlated with concreteness across languages. The dataset is made public online for further research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

18 of 73 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Learning Language Representations for Typology Predictioncited by 40
  2. 2020Phonotactic Complexity and its Trade-offscited by 23
  3. 2019What do Language Representations Really Represent?cited by 17
  4. 2018On the Complexity and Typology of Inflectional Morphological Systemscited by 15
  5. 2021Conceptual similarity and communicative need shape colexification: an experimental studycited by 14
  6. 2022Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Modelscited by 14
  7. 2018From Phonology to Syntax: Unsupervised Linguistic Typology at Different Levels with Language Embeddingscited by 13
  8. 2020SIGTYP 2020 Shared Task: Prediction of Typological Featurescited by 13
  9. 2021Multilingual and crosslingual speech recognition using phonological-vector based phone embeddingscited by 11
  10. 2023Crosslingual Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Languages Based on Multilingual Colexification Graphscited by 11
  11. 2020A Corpus for Large-Scale Phonetic Typologycited by 9
  12. 2021Does Typological Blinding Impede Cross-Lingual Sharing?cited by 9
6 more
  1. 2023Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizationscited by 9
  2. 2017Probabilistic Typology: Deep Generative Models of Vowel Inventoriescited by 8
  3. 2019A Probabilistic Generative Model of Linguistic Typologycited by 8
  4. 2017Tracking Typological Traits of Uralic Languages in Distributed Language Representationscited by 7
  5. 2019Uncovering Probabilistic Implications in Typological Knowledge Basescited by 4
  6. 2018A Deep Generative Model of Vowel Formant Typologycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.