mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimation

arXiv 2101.04108 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 45

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Controlling bias in training datasets is vital for ensuring equal treatment, or parity, between different groups in downstream applications. A naive solution is to transform the data so that it is statistically independent of group membership, but this may throw away too much information when a reasonable compromise between fairness and accuracy is desired. Another common approach is to limit the ability of a particular adversary who seeks to maximize parity. Unfortunately, representations produced by adversarial approaches may still retain biases as their efficacy is tied to the complexity of the adversary used during training. To this end, we theoretically establish that by limiting the mutual information between representations and protected attributes, we can assuredly control the parity of any downstream classifier. We demonstrate an effective method for controlling parity through mutual information based on contrastive information estimators and show that they outperform approaches that rely on variational bounds based on complex generative models. We test our approach on UCI Adult and Heritage Health datasets and demonstrate that our approach provides more informative representations across a range of desired parity thresholds while providing strong theoretical guarantees on the parity of any downstream algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 45 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.

Builds on

30 of 51 references.

References · 30

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  8. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
  9. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
  10. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  11. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  12. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
18 more
  1. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  2. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  3. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
  4. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 153
  5. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  6. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  7. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  8. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
  9. 2019Mitigating Information Leakage in Image Representations: A Maximum Entropy Approachcited by 48
  10. 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
  11. 2017Provably Fair Representationscited by 22
  12. 2019Invariant Representations through Adversarial Forgettingcited by 20
  13. 2020A Variational Approach to Privacy and Fairnesscited by 14
  14. 2020A Free-Energy Principle for Representation Learningcited by 7
  15. 2020Statistical Equity: A Fairness Classification Objectivecited by 7
  16. 2019Exact Rate-Distortion in Autoencoders via Echo Noisecited by 5
  17. 2019Is There a Trade-Off Between Fairness and Accuracy? A Perspective Using Mismatched Hypothesis Testingcited by 4
  18. 2018What About Applied Fairness?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 9; 2023: 10; 2024: 7; 2025: 12; 2026: 2.

45 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  2. 2021Fair Normalizing Flowscited by 38
  3. 2022Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness Constraintscited by 27
  4. 2021Conditional Contrastive Learning for Improving Fairness in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 25
  5. 2021Simpler, Faster, Stronger: Breaking The log-K Curse On Contrastive Learners With FlatNCEcited by 22
  6. 2022Fair Representation Learning through Implicit Path Alignmentcited by 22
  7. 2022FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical Certificatescited by 21
  8. 2022Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairnesscited by 21
  9. 2021Tight Mutual Information Estimation With Contrastive Fenchel-Legendre Optimizationcited by 18
  10. 2022MMD-B-Fair: Learning Fair Representations with Statistical Testingcited by 13
  11. 2023FAIRER: Fairness as Decision Rationale Alignmentcited by 12
  12. 2022Input-agnostic Certified Group Fairness via Gaussian Parameter Smoothingcited by 11
33 more
  1. 2021Attributing Fair Decisions with Attention Interventionscited by 10
  2. 2024Fair Bilevel Neural Network (FairBiNN): On Balancing fairness and accuracy via Stackelberg Equilibriumcited by 9
  3. 2025Prediction-Powered Causal Inferencescited by 9
  4. 2025Fair Representation Learning for Continuous Sensitive Attributes using Expectation of Integral Probability Metricscited by 7
  5. 2023FairDP: Certified Fairness with Differential Privacycited by 3
  6. 2023Towards Poisoning Fair Representationscited by 3
  7. 2025Fair Text Classification via Transferable Representationscited by 3
  8. 2025Fairness Overfitting in Machine Learning: An Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 3
  9. 2022Distraction is All You Need for Fairnesscited by 2
  10. 2023Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-playcited by 2
  11. 2023A survey on bias in machine learning researchcited by 2
  12. 2023Towards Practical Non-Adversarial Distribution Matchingcited by 2
  13. 2023From Principle to Practice: Vertical Data Minimization for Machine Learningcited by 2
  14. 2024Provable Optimization for Adversarial Fair Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2
  15. 2024Efficient Fairness-Performance Pareto Front Computationcited by 2
  16. 2024Fairness via Independence: A (Conditional) Distance Covariance Frameworkcited by 2
  17. 2022SoFaiR: Single Shot Fair Representation Learningcited by 1
  18. 2023A Novel Information-Theoretic Objective to Disentangle Representations for Fair Classificationcited by 1
  19. 2023Learning Fair Representations with High-Confidence Guaranteescited by 1
  20. 2025ReLU integral probability metric and its applicationscited by 1
  21. 2026Nearest-Neighbor Density Estimation for Dependency Suppressioncited by 1
  22. 2023Model and Evaluation: Towards Fairness in Multilingual Text Classificationcited by 0
  23. 2024From Discrete to Continuous: Deep Fair Clustering With Transferable Representationscited by 0
  24. 2024DispaRisk: Auditing Fairness Through Usable Informationcited by 0
  25. 2024Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learningcited by 0
  26. 2025PLS-based approach for fair representation learningcited by 0
  27. 2025Fair Sufficient Representation Learningcited by 0
  28. 2025Deep Fair Learning: Task-Aware Fair Representations via Joint Distance-Covariance Regularizationcited by 0
  29. 2025Simple and Effective Specialized Representations for Fair Classifierscited by 0
  30. 2025Expressive Score-Based Priors for Distribution Matching with Geometry-Preserving Regularizationcited by 0
  31. 2025FairContrast: Enhancing Fairness through Contrastive learning and Customized Augmenting Methods on Tabular Datacited by 0
  32. 2025Fair Representation Learning with Controllable High Confidence Guarantees via Adversarial Inferencecited by 0
  33. 2026Post-Training Fairness Control: A Single-Train Framework for Dynamic Fairness in Recommendationcited by 0